2009
DOI: 10.5650/jos.58.529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of Fluoride Ion by Bone Char Produced from Animal Biomass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
15
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
6
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior to the batch test, the concentration of phosphate was less than 0.01 mg/L, while the final concentration of phosphate was 0.8 mg/L. The increasing concentration of phosphate associated with the fluoride removal by bone char is similar to two previous works [22,37]. He et al [37] note that tricalcium phosphate is partially broken off in water which can occur in three different possible pH states: acidic, neutral, and alkaline.…”
Section: The Effect Of Multiple Ions On the Sorption Capacitysupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Prior to the batch test, the concentration of phosphate was less than 0.01 mg/L, while the final concentration of phosphate was 0.8 mg/L. The increasing concentration of phosphate associated with the fluoride removal by bone char is similar to two previous works [22,37]. He et al [37] note that tricalcium phosphate is partially broken off in water which can occur in three different possible pH states: acidic, neutral, and alkaline.…”
Section: The Effect Of Multiple Ions On the Sorption Capacitysupporting
confidence: 60%
“…There is significant difference for 1% vs. 2% and 2% vs. 4% thus increasing the concentration from 1% to 2% or from 2% to 4%, the concentration of the fluoride removed from bone char increases. The concentrations of phosphate ions eluted during defluoridation were compared to fluoride ions removed by bone char, and phosphate ions were found to be very low depending on the animal bone char used (Kawasaki et al, 2009). Ca 10 (PO 4 ) 6 (OH) 2 + 20F − + 2H + → 10CaF 2 + 6PO 4 3− + 2H 2 0 (3.4) At 95% confidence interval, 1% vs. 2% and 2% vs. 4% were found to be significantly different.…”
Section: Results and Discussion 31 Reactivation Of Fluoride Samentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fluoride ion is known to exchange with hydroxyl, carbonate, hydrogen carbonate, and phosphate ions of bone char during fluoride removal from water using bone char (Bailey, 1972;Abe et al, 2004;Kawasaki et al, 2009). During reactivation of fluoride saturated bone char, three different concentrations of the Na solutions: 1%, 2%, and 4% were used.…”
Section: Results and Discussion 31 Reactivation Of Fluoride Samentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bone can be collected from various sources such as slaughterhouses, ranchlands, restaurants and markets in general (Akinyi 2013). Kawasaki et al (2009) reported fluoride adsorption capacities of bone chars produced from different animals, including cattle, pigs, chickens and fishes. They revealed that yielding of bone char from cattle was the highest and it provided higher capacity for fluoride adsorption than bone char from pigs, chickens and fishes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%