2021
DOI: 10.32604/jrm.2021.014005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of Cu(II), Pb(II), Mg(II), and Fe(II) by Adsorption onto Alginate/Nanocellulose Beads as Bio-Sorbent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…They observed that the optimal ratio between components alginate/starch/n-clay was 1/2/3 (dried components) with a maximum removal efficiency of 95% for Cu 2+ ions after 25 h of contact. The removal of Cu 2+ , Mg 2+ , Fe 2+ , and Pb 2+ by using alginate combined with different nanocellulose biosorbents was studied by Abou-Zeid et al [ 32 ]. They found that tri-carboxylate cellulose nanofibers (TPC-CNF) combined with alginate presented high removal efficiency for the metal ions studied with the best values obtained for Pb (95%) and Cu (92%), but a lower removal efficiency for Mg (54%) and Fe (43%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They observed that the optimal ratio between components alginate/starch/n-clay was 1/2/3 (dried components) with a maximum removal efficiency of 95% for Cu 2+ ions after 25 h of contact. The removal of Cu 2+ , Mg 2+ , Fe 2+ , and Pb 2+ by using alginate combined with different nanocellulose biosorbents was studied by Abou-Zeid et al [ 32 ]. They found that tri-carboxylate cellulose nanofibers (TPC-CNF) combined with alginate presented high removal efficiency for the metal ions studied with the best values obtained for Pb (95%) and Cu (92%), but a lower removal efficiency for Mg (54%) and Fe (43%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lagoa et al [ 22 ] discovered in their work that dried alginate beads are more adsorbent due to the higher surface area. Alginate functionalized with other materials, such as activated carbon [ 23 ], biochar from biomass [ 24 , 25 ], carbon nanotubes [ 26 ], graphene [ 15 ], and other biopolymers [ 27 , 28 ] have also proved to be efficient in the removal of metals such as Cd 2+ [ 29 , 30 ], Cu 2+ [ 23 , 31 ], Mg 2+ , Fe 2+ [ 32 ], Pb 2+ [ 23 , 31 ], and Zn 2+ [ 31 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the affinity of native cellulose microfibers towards organic pollutants is 100 to 500 times lower than that of conventional nanomaterials, such as zeolite or activated carbon, due to the low number of active sites for interaction with the organic pollutants [107]. Alternatively, surface-modified nanocelluloses have been tested as support materials for the adsorption of various organic pollutants [39,[107][108][109][110][111][112][113][114][115][116][117][118][119][120][121][122][123][124]. This is mainly explained by their robust mechanical properties, the high specific surface area that allows creating active interaction sites after functionalization, and the small pore size of their filters/membranes.…”
Section: Adsorbents For Hazardous Organic Pollutants Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, when discarded after use, they pose a threat to environmental pollution [11,12]. Recent advances in adsorption technology addressing using biodegradable and sustainable natural polymers such as cellulose [13][14][15][16][17][18] chitosan [19][20][21][22], ionic chitosan/silica [23], alginate [24][25][26] and starch [27] , oxidized alginate/gelatin decorated silver nanoparticles [25]. For oil water separation, cellulose nanocrystals and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) nanofibers [28,29] and bacterial cellulose and crosslinked cellulose nanofibers membranes were used [30] .The wide use of polymeric materials leads to the waste removal management difficulties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%