2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2014.06.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of cobalt(II) ion from aqueous solution by chitosan–montmorillonite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Montmorillonite (MMT), the main component of bentonite, is a layered aluminosilicate mineral that belongs to the montmorillonite/smectite group of clay minerals. Chitosan/ montmorillonite composite prepared by different approaches has successfully employed to adsorb dye 30 , Cobalt (II) 31 , Copper (II) 32 , and tannic acid 33 . However, there have been few reports for using chitosan/montmorillonite composite as an adsorbent to remove silver ion from aqueous solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Montmorillonite (MMT), the main component of bentonite, is a layered aluminosilicate mineral that belongs to the montmorillonite/smectite group of clay minerals. Chitosan/ montmorillonite composite prepared by different approaches has successfully employed to adsorb dye 30 , Cobalt (II) 31 , Copper (II) 32 , and tannic acid 33 . However, there have been few reports for using chitosan/montmorillonite composite as an adsorbent to remove silver ion from aqueous solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison of the maximum Cu(II), Co(II) and Ni(II) adsorption capacity, q max (mg/g) on CMA and some other chitosan and chitosanbased materials as adsorbents reported in the literatures [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47] are shown in Table 3. In the present work, the q max of CMA were 195 (sites A and B), 220 (site C), and 340 (sites B and C) mg/g, respectively which were comparable and indicated that CMA solid phase had a high sorption capacity and excellent performance towards Cu(II), Co(II) and Ni(II) attributed to its high specific area, widely distributed pores, and plenty of powerful chelating groups.…”
Section: Comparison Of Biosorption Capacity Of Cma With Reported Adsomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many cases the pseudo-first order model failed to describe the adsorption kinetic data Gupta 2006, 2011;Akar et al 2009;Chen and Zhao 2009;Koswojo et al 2010;Kurniawan et al 2011;Toor and Jin 2012;Vanamudan et al 2014;Wang et al 2014;Dos Santos et al 2015). Kurniawan et al (2011) found the inconsistency of the fitted value of parameter k 1 with its physical meaning, the value of k 1 , increase with the increasing of initial solute concentration, hence the pseudo-first order model is not the correct choice to represent the kinetic experimental data.…”
Section: The Pseudo-first Order Kineticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most adsorption systems using clay minerals and its modified forms as the adsorbents, the pseudo-second order kinetic model could represent the experimental data much better than the pseudo-first order kinetic Gupta 2006, 2011;Tsai et al 2007;Akar et al 2009;Chen and Zhao 2009;Koswojo et al 2010;Kul and Koyuncu 2010;Kurniawan et al 2011;Toor and Jin 2012;Auta and Hameed 2012;Lv et al 2014;Vanamudan et al 2014;Wang et al 2014;Dos Santos et al 2015). A potential advantage of the pseudo-second order equation as an expression estimating the q e values is its small sensitivity to the influence of the random experimental error (Plazinzki et al 2009).…”
Section: The Pseudo-second Order Kineticmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation