2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of Arsenic(III) from water using magnetite precipitated onto Douglas fir biochar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
72
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
6
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While Son et al [6] developed an engineered magnetic biochar by pyrolyzing waste marine macro-alga, and found that the adsorption efficiency of heavy metal was partially reduced by magnetic biochar. These investigations and other studies [7][8][9][10] showed that the adsorption capacity of heavy metal by magnetic biochar, might be higher or lower than to that of nonmagnetic biochar. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the effect of magnetism loading on biochar in terms of the cationic heavy metal adsorption capacity, before a decision for the potential use of magnetic biochar as an industrial adsorbent is made.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While Son et al [6] developed an engineered magnetic biochar by pyrolyzing waste marine macro-alga, and found that the adsorption efficiency of heavy metal was partially reduced by magnetic biochar. These investigations and other studies [7][8][9][10] showed that the adsorption capacity of heavy metal by magnetic biochar, might be higher or lower than to that of nonmagnetic biochar. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the effect of magnetism loading on biochar in terms of the cationic heavy metal adsorption capacity, before a decision for the potential use of magnetic biochar as an industrial adsorbent is made.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…CMB, implying the driving force to the adsorption increased with increasing temperature [44]. Meanwhile, the positive values of ∆H 0 highlighted the endothermic nature of adsorption by both biochars, and the positive values of ∆S 0 indicated randomness slightly increased during metal chemisopriotn from solution onto the surface of biochar [8,45].…”
Section: Magnetic Separation Of M-cmbmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…reactions of CV onto BC-PKS are endothermic, suggesting the adsorption of CV was more favorable with increasing temperature [10,88]. In addition, ΔH 0 was 60.5 kJ/mol, indicating that CV adsorption onto BC-PKS was achieved via chemisorption, which occurs when ΔH 0 > 40 kJ/mol [89,90]. The positive values of ∆S ○ for BC-PKS signify an increase in the disorder at the interfaces between CV and BC-PKS during the CV adsorption on BC-PKS that is accompanied with changes in the CV and BC-PKS structures [10,91].…”
Section: Effects Of the Ph Of The Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fe oxides-supported biochar is still commonly used to remove As in 2019. Fe oxides in biochar facilitated the removal of As mainly through inner-sphere complexing or precipitation with Fe oxides, complexing with oxygen-functional groups on biochar (Cui et al 2019;Navarathna et al 2019). The As(III) oxidation induced by Fe oxides-supported biochar was an important reaction for removing As through adsorption of oxidized As(V) species and decreasing As toxicity.…”
Section: Heavy Metal Immobilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%