2020
DOI: 10.3390/app10072251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Removal of Crystal Violet from Textile Wastewater Using Palm Kernel Shell-Derived Biochar

Abstract: In this study, we explored the adsorption potential of biochar derived from palm kernel shell (BC-PKS) as an affordable adsorbent for the removal of crystal violet from wastewater. Kinetics, equilibrium, and thermodynamics studies were carried out to evaluate the adsorption of crystal violet onto BC-PKS. The kinetics adsorption process followed the pseudo-second-order model, indicating that the rate of adsorption is principally controlled by chemisorption. The adsorption equilibrium data were better fitted by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
(59 reference statements)
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These reported results inspire future efforts to improve adsorption capacity of SF:SS biopolymer composite by incorporating carbon nanomaterials, e.g., (reduced) graphene oxide and carbon nanotubes. A further comparison of adsorption capacity with other classes of adsorbent was carried out as follows: The present results of SF:SS (4:1) show better CV adsorption capacity of 83.31 mg•g −1 (according to the Langmuir adsorption isotherm) compared to the biochar derived from palm-kernel shell [55]. For Cu 2+ adsorption, the SF:SS biocomposite adsorbent exhibits better adsorption capacity, of up to 73.22 mg•g −1 , than that of algae-based bioadsorbent, which showed an adsorption capacity of 42.25 mg•g −1 [56].…”
Section: Pollutantmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…These reported results inspire future efforts to improve adsorption capacity of SF:SS biopolymer composite by incorporating carbon nanomaterials, e.g., (reduced) graphene oxide and carbon nanotubes. A further comparison of adsorption capacity with other classes of adsorbent was carried out as follows: The present results of SF:SS (4:1) show better CV adsorption capacity of 83.31 mg•g −1 (according to the Langmuir adsorption isotherm) compared to the biochar derived from palm-kernel shell [55]. For Cu 2+ adsorption, the SF:SS biocomposite adsorbent exhibits better adsorption capacity, of up to 73.22 mg•g −1 , than that of algae-based bioadsorbent, which showed an adsorption capacity of 42.25 mg•g −1 [56].…”
Section: Pollutantmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Moreover, the biochar itself can vary based on the initial biomass from which it is produced. In order to find the best biochar-dye combination, a summary of articles examining different combinations was made [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 summarizes different characteristics from 18 articles that present the use of biochar in treatment of textile wastewater [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43]. The articles are catagorized to biochar properties, dye properties, experimental conditions, dye adsorption experiments compared to a common biochar and modified biochar.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, until now, no one has investigated the potential of palm kernel shell biochar (PKSB) for the removal of PAHs. Thus far, few scientific research studies are reported in the literature on the usage of PKSB for the adsorption of fluoride [30], heavy metals [31,32], crystal violet [33], and phenol [34] regarding efficient removal performance [35]. The positive outcomes of PKSB for different applications encourage investigating its potential for the removal of PAHs from PW.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%