2015
DOI: 10.1177/0308022614549962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal notice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary adaptation for the COPM was the creation of a binder that contained common activities in each of the three occupational performance areas identified in the Canadian Model of Occupational Performance: self-care, productivity, and leisure (Boniface, 2012). This was modeled after the work of Coates, Irvine, and Sutherland (2015) who used these strategies successfully with an individual with aphasia when using the COPM. The researchers collected or created 62 photographs to match the COPM items.…”
Section: Modifications To Assessment Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The primary adaptation for the COPM was the creation of a binder that contained common activities in each of the three occupational performance areas identified in the Canadian Model of Occupational Performance: self-care, productivity, and leisure (Boniface, 2012). This was modeled after the work of Coates, Irvine, and Sutherland (2015) who used these strategies successfully with an individual with aphasia when using the COPM. The researchers collected or created 62 photographs to match the COPM items.…”
Section: Modifications To Assessment Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted above, depending on the complexity of the assessment or intervention being modified or supported with these strategies, they may not always reach the desired end goal. Also, while others have adapted the COPM using similar strategies (Coates et al, 2015;Escher, Amlani, Viani, & Berger, 2018), validation studies with the application of these techniques with this population using these communication strategies are limited. Although the findings from recent studies confirm the effectiveness of many of the aphasia-friendly modifications described within this article, additional research is needed to understand various factors that contribute to their effectiveness.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%