2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal mechanisms of Cr(VI) and Cr(III) by biochar supported nanosized zero-valent iron: Synergy of adsorption, reduction and transformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
68
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
2
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Usually, the number of active sites increases with the increase of adsorbent doses that yields higher surface area resulting in access to the metal ions to get interacted with the active sites of the adsorbent [23]. Similar results were obtained by Qiu, et al in their research work on Cr(III) removal using sludge-derived biochar with supported nanosized zero-valent iron [24]. However, the sorption capacity reduces with an augmentation of the adsorbent amount.…”
Section: +supporting
confidence: 67%
“…Usually, the number of active sites increases with the increase of adsorbent doses that yields higher surface area resulting in access to the metal ions to get interacted with the active sites of the adsorbent [23]. Similar results were obtained by Qiu, et al in their research work on Cr(III) removal using sludge-derived biochar with supported nanosized zero-valent iron [24]. However, the sorption capacity reduces with an augmentation of the adsorbent amount.…”
Section: +supporting
confidence: 67%
“… 5 , 17 , 18 , 27 One was to modify feedstock with FeCl 3 ·6H 2 O before pyrolysis denoted as x BC-Fe@B, 44 and the other was to modify biochar with zerovalent iron (ZVI) after pyrolysis followed by a drying process, denoted as xBC-Fe@A. 43 Both modified biochars were pyrolyzed and sieved as described above. For the sample names, the letters A and B were referred as post-modification and pre-modification methods, respectively, and letter x was referred as the modifier ratio.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40 . However, the reduced removal capacity in higher dosage could be due to inter-particle aggregation, overlapping of adsorption sites, and consequently, less active surface area 15,41 .…”
Section: Effects Of Sn/fe Mass Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason behind the improvement of removal efficiency is that a higher dosage of composite would provide larger surface area and more available active adsorption sites and more galvanic couples, which could enhance available electrons for Cr(VI) reduction 40 . However, the reduced removal capacity in higher dosage could be due to inter-particle aggregation, overlapping of adsorption sites, and consequently, less active surface area 15,41 .…”
Section: Effects Of Talc-nzvi/sn Dosagementioning
confidence: 99%