2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2019.103555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal and recovery of a cationic surfactant from its aqueous solution by foam fractionation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, these results indicate that the molar ratio of RBB KN-R and DTAB in the precipitate was much higher than 1:1, corresponding to a small amount of DTAB, thus confirming the conjecture from Figure 7 and the results in Figures 8B and 9A. In addition, the DTAB in the supernatant could be recovered by foam fractionation for reuse [46][47][48].…”
Section: Ftirsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, these results indicate that the molar ratio of RBB KN-R and DTAB in the precipitate was much higher than 1:1, corresponding to a small amount of DTAB, thus confirming the conjecture from Figure 7 and the results in Figures 8B and 9A. In addition, the DTAB in the supernatant could be recovered by foam fractionation for reuse [46][47][48].…”
Section: Ftirsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…These results suggest that only a small number of DTAB molecules participated in the insoluble aggregation of RBB KN-R. Furthermore, we used the method for measuring the CTAB concentration reported by Kumar et al [46] to detect the DTAB concentration in the supernatant. Then, the molar ratio of RBB KN-R vs. DTAB in the precipitate was calculated as 1: 0.14 (±0.01), corresponding to a DTAB mass ratio of 7.5 ± 0.5%. )…”
Section: Ftirmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Surfactant properties in liquid solutions and foams are the main driving forces for foam fractionation separations, alongside the hydrodynamics of gas–liquid flow and the mass transfer kinetics. In other words, the chemical structure of surfactants (i.e., cationic, anionic, and non-ionic) may significantly control foam fractionation performances. For example, highly hydrophobic molecules are adsorbed strongly on bubble surfaces and removed from the foam phase . Surfactant molecular size also influences surfactant removal since smaller molecules are more concentrated on bubble surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the chemical structure of surfactants (i.e., cationic, anionic, and non-ionic) may significantly control foam fractionation performances. 13 15 For example, highly hydrophobic molecules are adsorbed strongly on bubble surfaces and removed from the foam phase. 16 Surfactant molecular size also influences surfactant removal since smaller molecules are more concentrated on bubble surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%