2008
DOI: 10.3832/ifor0305-0010006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote sensing support for post fire forest management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
13
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(18 reference statements)
2
13
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in general accordance with other studies examining ecosystem resilience [58] or long-term post-fire regeneration [17]. Our combined approach based on remote sensing techniques [31] and geographic information systems does not require large capital investment. Through simple techniques, sites that require special focus and extra effort regarding ecosystems recovery can be identified.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in general accordance with other studies examining ecosystem resilience [58] or long-term post-fire regeneration [17]. Our combined approach based on remote sensing techniques [31] and geographic information systems does not require large capital investment. Through simple techniques, sites that require special focus and extra effort regarding ecosystems recovery can be identified.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Given the discrepancies between the land cover legends of the available pre-and post-fire land cover maps and the limitations arising from the use of satellite data [31], we developed a classification scheme that minimizes misclassification errors. The classification scheme adopted consists of four land cover classes: (a) dense P. brutia woodland (cover > 25%); (b) open P. brutia woodland (cover < 25%); (c) scrubland (with non-significant presence of individual P. brutia trees (scattered trees) from the cover-abundance point of view; and (d) phrygana (garrigues) representing sparsely vegetated areas where trees and tall shrubs were absent.…”
Section: Pre-fire and Post-fire Land Cover Mapping And Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of remote sensing platform for fire recovery monitoring depends on both the severity and size of the fire. As noted by Corona et al [2008] burned areas larger than 50 ha can be mapped by medium to low resolution sensors such as WiFS-IRS, NOAA AVHRR, MODIS, or Spot-Vegetation. However, most of these records lack the long archive of Landsat which hinders monitoring burn recovery across several decades.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to target preventive and mitigation measures in forest and shrublands, however, field-based indicators of land degradation should be collected to validate ESAI assessments , eventually combined with remotely sensed monitoring of forest conditions (Corona et al 2008). LD monitoring would be particularly crucial in areas experiencing rapid changes in climate quality (e.g., reduced precipitation rates over a relatively short time or recurrent drought episodes, intense rainfall events, continuous increase in summer temperatures causing vegetation stress, etc.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%