2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2014.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote sensing of spring phenology in northeastern forests: A comparison of methods, field metrics and sources of uncertainty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
106
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
7
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EVI was found to perform moderately better than NDVI when compared against ground observed GPP SOS, similar to the results reported by [74]. PPI-SOS on the other hand showed a highly significant agreement with GPP-SOS, yet the correlation coefficient obtained was modest (r = 0.5).…”
Section: Sos Detection and Evaluation Against Gpp-sossupporting
confidence: 87%
“…EVI was found to perform moderately better than NDVI when compared against ground observed GPP SOS, similar to the results reported by [74]. PPI-SOS on the other hand showed a highly significant agreement with GPP-SOS, yet the correlation coefficient obtained was modest (r = 0.5).…”
Section: Sos Detection and Evaluation Against Gpp-sossupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Some researchers have reported differences between the values of the phenological parameters calculated based on different data sources and extraction methods for the same study area [56]. We used the dynamic-threshold method in the TIMESAT software to extract vegetation phenological parameters.…”
Section: Phenological Parameters Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SPOT-4 and SPOT-5 VEGETATION data time series have been effective in detecting variations in leaf phenology of deciduous broadleaved forest in different elevations, extracting a five year perpendicular vegetation index (PVI) and using a temporal unmixing method (Guyon et al 2011). A number of indices from MODIS or Landsat data, including Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI), NDVI, Excess Green Index (ExG M ), and Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI), were evaluated in several studies (Hmimina et al 2013;Hufkens et al 2012;White et al 2014). The optimized soil-adjusted vegetation index (OS-AVI), calculated from MODIS data, was more consistent than NDVI and EVI in characterizing Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) end in evergreen needleleaved forests, encouraging its broader use (Wu et al 2014).…”
Section: Forestry Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%