2018
DOI: 10.5194/bg-15-2723-2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote sensing of canopy nitrogen at regional scale in Mediterranean forests using the spaceborne MERIS Terrestrial Chlorophyll Index

Abstract: Abstract. Canopy nitrogen (N) concentration and content are linked to several vegetation processes. Therefore, canopy N concentration is a state variable in global vegetation models with coupled carbon (C) and N cycles. While there are ample C data available to constrain the models, widespread N data are lacking. Remotely sensed vegetation indices have been used to detect canopy N concentration and canopy N content at the local scale in grasslands and forests. Vegetation indices could be a valuable tool to det… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Three decades ago, researchers began using remote sensing to estimate leaf and canopy traits. While particular nutrients (mainly N; Filella, Serrano, Serra, & Peñuelas, ; Kokaly et al, ; Loozen et al, ; Serrano, Peñuelas, & Ustin, ) have been estimated frequently, other traits relevant to the nutrient status, such as LDMC, can be estimated as well but with low accuracy (Homolova, Maenovsky, Clevers, Garcia‐Santos, & Schaepman, ). For this reason, the focus in this review section is merely on stoichiometry.…”
Section: Remote Sensing‐derived Indicators Of the Nutrient Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Three decades ago, researchers began using remote sensing to estimate leaf and canopy traits. While particular nutrients (mainly N; Filella, Serrano, Serra, & Peñuelas, ; Kokaly et al, ; Loozen et al, ; Serrano, Peñuelas, & Ustin, ) have been estimated frequently, other traits relevant to the nutrient status, such as LDMC, can be estimated as well but with low accuracy (Homolova, Maenovsky, Clevers, Garcia‐Santos, & Schaepman, ). For this reason, the focus in this review section is merely on stoichiometry.…”
Section: Remote Sensing‐derived Indicators Of the Nutrient Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mitchell, Glenn, Sankey, Derryberry, & Germino, ; Serrano et al, ; Wang, Skidmore, Skidmore, Darvishzadeh, & Wang, ) or satellites (e.g. Loozen et al, ; Ollinger et al, ), depending on the desired resolution and scope of the study. Typically, concentrations of a particular element are estimated per pixel after an empirical calibration procedure in which reflectance in the 400–2400 nm range is matched with concentrations determined by standard laboratory procedures (Homolova et al, ).…”
Section: Remote Sensing‐derived Indicators Of the Nutrient Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average reflectance I and reflectance variability σ were calculated for the five bands. This dataset with known N and P concentrations was used as the learning set [42][43][44] in the linear regression with multiple variables (LRMV) algorithm which is one of the machine learning methods [45][46][47][48][49][50]. The main goal of LRMV method is to find the linear dependencies between reflectance intensity and variability in five optical channels and parameters we want to estimate for all trees, P and N concentrations in this particular case.…”
Section: Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using hyperspectral images of the canopy, model qualities to predict the P content in the perennial grass Holcus lanatus reached values of r²=0.33 respectively 0.26 depending on the algorithm chosen (van Buul, 2017). For forest sites, the model quality was considerably lower and reached an r² of 0.269 for P (van Buul, 2017) and 0.69 for N (Loozen et al, 2018) in a Catalonian pine dominated mixed species stand.…”
Section: Foliage P Concentrations In Relation To Soil P Poolsmentioning
confidence: 99%