2013
DOI: 10.14358/pers.79.9.809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote Sensing-based House Value Estimation Using an Optimized Regional Regression Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The RF model exhibits the poorest performance in comparison to other machine learning methods, like the comparison based on in situ SR data. The reason behind comparatively below average performance of RF could be due to the small training dataset [4,63,64]. On the other hand, SVR showed good performance and good agreement with the previous studies, in which SVR worked well with a small sample size of input variables [43].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Machine Learning Regression Using Satellite-desupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The RF model exhibits the poorest performance in comparison to other machine learning methods, like the comparison based on in situ SR data. The reason behind comparatively below average performance of RF could be due to the small training dataset [4,63,64]. On the other hand, SVR showed good performance and good agreement with the previous studies, in which SVR worked well with a small sample size of input variables [43].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Machine Learning Regression Using Satellite-desupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Unlike other rule-based regression trees, Cubist produces rules, each of which has an associated multivariate regression; therefore, when multiple rules are applied, the final output can be averaged. Cubist has been widely used for regression applications in remote sensing (Brown et al 2008;Im et al 2012;Lu et al 2013;Kim et al 2014;Li et al 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This way, RF overcomes the well-known limitation of CART, in that results are sensitive to the configuration and quality of training data (Lawrence and Wright, 2001;Rhee et al, 2014;Guo and Du, 2017). Thus, RF has recently gained popularity in remote sensing classification and regression Li et al, 2014;Liu et al, 2015;Lu et al, 2013;Park et al, 2016;Yoo et al, 2012). Two approaches are generally adopted to reach a final conclusion from the independent decision trees including a simple majority voting and weighted majority voting strategy for classification, while a final value is either simply averaged from the results of the multiple regression trees or averaged with weights for regression.…”
Section: Deterministic and Probabilistic Approaches For CI Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%