Remodelling the role of facilitating conditions for Google Classroom acceptance: A revision of UTAUT2

Abstract

Online learning environments have become a contemporary component of global tertiary education due to their affordances. These environments are hinged on internet-based learning management systems and one such tool is Google Classroom. However, empirical studies have indicated that gaps exist in determining how Google Classroom influences students’ behavioural intention to use it for online learning. Accordingly, this study defines a model based on the unified theory of acceptance and technology 2 (UTAUT2) to examine the relationship between facilitating conditions and other variables towards intention formation for Google Classroom usage. Based on a mixed method using the explanatory sequential design, survey data from 163 students were initially analysed using partial least squares structural equation modelling followed by a qualitative approach based on open-ended questions for thematic analysis. Results from the partial least squares structural equation modelling approach validated the hypothesised model confirming the significant predictive relationship of facilitating conditions with effort expectancy, hedonic motivation, habit and social influence but had an insignificant relationship with behavioural intention. Furthermore, hedonic motivation and habit were the main predictors of behavioural intention by masking the role of facilitating conditions. Subsequently, the qualitative outcome indicated that habit and perceived control of using Google applications influence hedonic motivation. Finally, recommendations were made to universities towards policy formation and practice of virtual learning using Google Classroom.
 Implications for practice or policy:
 
 Higher education institutions should create an environment for students to be motivated and enjoy Google Classroom use.
 Universities should provide Internet, technical and pedagogical support for students’ Google Classroom use.
 Universities should explain to students the affordances of using Google Classroom.
 Universities should encourage students to acquire access gadgets (smartphones or tablets) for Google Classroom use.

Hey, let's take a selfie: insights of selfie defamiliarisation in the classroom

“…This study utilises two mobile-based applications: Google Classroom (GC) and Adobe Spark Post (ASP). GC is a learning management system (LMS) widely adopted due to its easy learnability (Kumar et al, 2020), adaptiveness, mobile-friendliness, and open source (Bervell et al, 2022). In comparison, ASP is a digital editing tool used to design and animate visual content for social media explicitly.…”

“…GC is a learning management system (LMS) widely adopted due to its easy learnability (Kumar et al. , 2020), adaptiveness, mobile-friendliness, and open source (Bervell et al. , 2022).…”

Online collaborative tools for science education: Boosting learning outcomes, motivation, and engagement

“…Each of these has been extensively studied and found effective for online learning and collaboration. For instance, Google Classroom facilitates assignment management and communication (Bervell et al, 2022; Delos Reyes et al, 2022; Tarteer et al, 2022), Slack promotes team collaboration (Fontes et al, 2022; Leonardi & Torchiano, 2022; Papathoma, 2022), Microsoft Teams offers comprehensive communication tools integrating with Microsoft Office (Al Enezi et al, 2022; Gotlib et al, 2022; Rajaram et al, 2022), and so on for the other tools mentioned, each serving a unique educational purpose.…”

The intersection of music and arts education and technology: assessing Google Meet’s usability in a case of a prominent local college

“…Scholarly information about Google Meet has been predominantly massive to other countries and educational institutions of various disciplines over the past years (Hastomo & Zulianti, 2021;Hutajulu, 2022;Nehe, 2021). Studies were able to accentuate essential factors that may significantly affect students' perception of the serviceability of Google Meet as a pedagogical platform by adopting various models and theories such as the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) and the Expanded Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2) from various disciplines (Aiman et al, 2022;Alvi, 2021;Brandford Bervell et al, 2021). Aside from these models, other factors were also added to predicting students' system utilization (Suwarno, 2022;Tolba & Youssef, 2022).…”