2013
DOI: 10.1080/00220388.2013.812196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remittances in Nepal: Boon or Bane?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nepal is one of the highest recipients of remittances (percentage of GDP) in the world (Sapkota, 2013). In this connection, Nepal has a long history of foreign employment with remittance playing an important role in the livelihood of many people.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nepal is one of the highest recipients of remittances (percentage of GDP) in the world (Sapkota, 2013). In this connection, Nepal has a long history of foreign employment with remittance playing an important role in the livelihood of many people.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For many developing nations, migrants contribute remittances to those family members who remain behind. For Nepal, remittances account for as much as 20% of the gross domestic product (GDP) (Sapkota 2013). Remittances maintain a linkage between the migrant and the remaining family, where those who stay behind continue to be impacted after the migrant has left.…”
Section: Migrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, changes in flows of remittances and human resources from the diaspora should be incorporated sensitively into the management of any response. Nepal is one of the leading recipients of remittances (as a percentage of gross domestic product) in the world; those received between 1995-96 and 2003-04 contributed to between one-third and one-half of the reduction in poverty throughout the country during that period (Sapkota, 2013). Hence, the likely disruption of remittance flows owing to death, displacement, and damage to communications and transport infrastructure will have a significant impact on the coping capacity of the affected population (Harvey and Savage, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%