2021
DOI: 10.1080/00016357.2020.1869827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remineralization potential and caries preventive efficacy of CPP-ACP/Xylitol/Ozone/Bioactive glass and topical fluoride combined therapy versus fluoride mono-therapy – a systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
1
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
20
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…16 To date, majority of published studies demonstrated superiority of CPP-ACP fluoride varnishes when compared to conventional fluoride varnishes. [17][18][19][20] However, in our study the comparison of remineralisation efficacy between the G1 and CPP-ACP compounds fluoride varnish was not significant. it was concluded that both fluoride…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…16 To date, majority of published studies demonstrated superiority of CPP-ACP fluoride varnishes when compared to conventional fluoride varnishes. [17][18][19][20] However, in our study the comparison of remineralisation efficacy between the G1 and CPP-ACP compounds fluoride varnish was not significant. it was concluded that both fluoride…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…We identified 26 citations of which 10 systematic reviews (Albedah et al, 2013;Azarpazhooh & Limeback, 2008;Brazzelli et al, 2006;Deepthi & Bilichodmath, 2020;German et al, 2013;Moraschini et al, 2020;Santos et al, 2020;Sharda et al, 2021;Silva et al, 2020;Sridharan & Sivaramakrishnan, 2021) and 16 narrative reviews (Almaz & Sönmez, 2015;Chirumbolo et al, 2021;Domb, 2019;Gupta & Mansi, 2012;Haghighat & Oshaghi, 2020;Lacerda et al, 2021;Lio et al, 2020;Mohammadi et al, 2013;Nogales et al, 2008;Re et al, 2020;Seidler et al, 2008;Suh et al, 2019;Swanson et al, 2021;Tiwari et al, 2017;Trevor Burke, 2012;Tricarico et al, 2020); met the criteria for inclusion in the Map. Most of the reviews were published in the 2008, 2012 and 2014.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The group of physical and metabolic effects were the most present in the reviews in general, with the effects of topical ozonized water and the oxygen-ozone gas mixture were positive for reducing bacterial colony, reducing dental biofilm and decreasing viral load (Domb, 2019;German et al, 2013;Gupta & Mansi, 2012;Santos et al, 2020;Sharda et al, 2021). For these same types of interventions and outcomes when applied for root canal disinfection it did not have the same effects on the result, which were inconclusive and even negative, as well as ozone gas and photodynamic therapy for the outcome of bacterial reduction (Seidler et al, 2008;Silva et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It involved the tryptic digestion of milk caseinate to produce multiphosphorylated casein phosphopeptides (CPPs), increasing the milk protein’s solubility and ability to stabilize calcium phosphate complex ions [ 2 ]. Some randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews have suggested that CPP-ACP has led to significant remineralization and caries prevention [ 22 , 23 ], but conflicting results have been found by others, concluding that the evidence to support its long-term remineralizing [ 24 , 25 ] or synergistic effect with fluoride is absent [ 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%