2004
DOI: 10.1007/bf02991055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remediation of contaminated soil using soil washing and biopile methodologies at a field level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
18
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been reported that most of these microorganisms found in contaminated soil exhibit metabolic capabilities that result in organic compound degradation (Torres et al, 2005). Iturbe et al (2004b) reported the presence of Bacillus, Micrococcus, and Turicela genera during a 100-m 3 biopile operation. The species recognized in pristine soils of that work were B. brevis, B. liqueniformis, M. luteus, M. sedentarius, and T. otiditis.…”
Section: Microbiological Determinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that most of these microorganisms found in contaminated soil exhibit metabolic capabilities that result in organic compound degradation (Torres et al, 2005). Iturbe et al (2004b) reported the presence of Bacillus, Micrococcus, and Turicela genera during a 100-m 3 biopile operation. The species recognized in pristine soils of that work were B. brevis, B. liqueniformis, M. luteus, M. sedentarius, and T. otiditis.…”
Section: Microbiological Determinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process can be developed in situ (Iturbe et al 2004b) or in washing ditches (Iturbe et al 2004a), the process is based on the high capabilities possessed by surfactants to increase the hydrophobic compounds solubility in water and, even, to form micelles, which in turn will mobilize the contaminants into the surfactant solution, eliminating them from the soil (Lopez et al 2004;Torres et al 2004). …”
Section: Considering the State Of Arizona Legislation Limits The Analmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have found that sodium dodecyl sulphate posses greater petroleum hydrocarbon removal than other surfactants employed [6][7][8]23]. Its use for restoration of soil contaminated with TPHs and PAHs has been proved to be as efficient as the use of biopiles or in situ flushing pilot plant (41 m 3 ) with similar operational costs (140, 94 and 104 US$/m 3 , respectively) [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%