1984
DOI: 10.1016/0041-5553(84)90253-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remarks on choosing a regularization parameter using the quasi-optimality and ratio criterion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
180
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
3
180
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…parameter λ>0 depends on the amount of noise, as it should [3], and, as expected, it increases as the amount of noise increases. Also, the larger the portion of the data provided the less ill-posed the problem, hence a smaller regularization parameter is required.…”
Section: Example 2 (N=3-dimensions)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…parameter λ>0 depends on the amount of noise, as it should [3], and, as expected, it increases as the amount of noise increases. Also, the larger the portion of the data provided the less ill-posed the problem, hence a smaller regularization parameter is required.…”
Section: Example 2 (N=3-dimensions)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LSQR method is an implementation of the conjugate gradient method applied to the normal equations associated with (1). Let the initial iterate be x 0 = 0.…”
Section: Parameter Choice Rules For Large Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are interested in the situation when no such bound is known and, therefore, the discrepancy principle cannot be applied. It has been shown by Bakushinski [1] that regularization parameter choice rules that do not use a bound for e will fail to determine a suitable value of k for some problems. Such rules are therefore sometimes referred to as "heuristic."…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We are concerned with the approximate solution of large-scale minimization problems (1.1) when no accurate estimate of e is available or for whichb ∈ R(A). We note that since our criterion for determining µ does not use e , it may fail for some problems; see [3] for a discussion. Nevertheless, numerous numerical experiments, some of which are reported in Section 5, show the proposed method to perform well for many problems and to be competitive with other schemes that do not use e for determining µ.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%