2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11075-012-9612-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Old and new parameter choice rules for discrete ill-posed problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
117
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
117
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the least-squares estimation becomes highly unreliable and is unable to obtain accurate estimations of the parameters. In order to overcome the ill-posedness of the problem, truncated singular value decomposition (TSVD) [26][27][28] is adopted. TSVD truncates the small singular values that greatly enlarge the variances to improve the least-squares estimation.…”
Section: Estimation Of Pure Volume Coherence From the Complex Interfementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the least-squares estimation becomes highly unreliable and is unable to obtain accurate estimations of the parameters. In order to overcome the ill-posedness of the problem, truncated singular value decomposition (TSVD) [26][27][28] is adopted. TSVD truncates the small singular values that greatly enlarge the variances to improve the least-squares estimation.…”
Section: Estimation Of Pure Volume Coherence From the Complex Interfementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of approaches can be used to determine a suitable value of the regularization parameter µ, including the L-curve, generalized cross validation, and the discrepancy principle; see, e.g., [4,8,11,16,23] for discussions and references. We will use the discrepancy principle in the computed examples of Section 4.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This typically requires the computation of the solution of (1.4) for several values of µ > 0. For instance, when µ is determined by the discrepancy principle, the L-curve criterion, or the generalized cross validation method, the minimization problem (1.4) has to be solved for several values of µ > 0 to be able to determine a suitable µ-value; see [4,8,11,16,23] for discussions on these and other methods for determining a suitable value of µ. The repeated solution of (1.4) for different µ-values can be carried out fairly inexpensively when A and B are of small to medium size by first computing the generalized singular value decomposition (GSVD) of the matrix pair {A, B}.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For an elaborate comparison of the L-curve method with other ways of fixing model parameters in a priori under-determined inverse problems, see [35]. To the best of our knowledge the conjugate gradient minimisation of the cost function, associated with (3), together with the subsequent, automated determination of parameter λ using the discrete L-curve has not been used before for tomographic reconstruction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%