Remaking Citizenship in Multicultural Europe 2012
DOI: 10.1057/9781137272157_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remaking Citizenship in Multicultural Europe: Women’s Movements, Gender and Diversity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tufte, 2003), including the intersectional effects of gender and ethnicity (cf. Roseneil, Halsaa, & Sümer, 2012), women's rights to representation in Norway are ensured through the Gender Equality Act (2007). The special provision that gender equality has in law over other minorities, therefore, warrants research on female voices in the news on the grounds that news media provide arenas for conflict mitigation in a structural pluralism context (cf.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tufte, 2003), including the intersectional effects of gender and ethnicity (cf. Roseneil, Halsaa, & Sümer, 2012), women's rights to representation in Norway are ensured through the Gender Equality Act (2007). The special provision that gender equality has in law over other minorities, therefore, warrants research on female voices in the news on the grounds that news media provide arenas for conflict mitigation in a structural pluralism context (cf.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This framework emphasizes the role of informal practices in shaping power dynamics within academic settings. It also highlights the importance of understanding how these everyday practices are perceived and experienced by academics, as emphasized by Roseneil et al (2012) in the concept of "lived citizenship". In this study, we specifically focus on the components of recognition and belonging within this framework to gain insights into the lived experiences of academic citizenship during the pandemic.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework: Gendered Academic Citizenshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Socioeconomically excluded, stigmatised, and policed as a result of intersectional factors that include sexism, racism, and classism, women in low-autonomy sex industry sectors face numerous mutually reinforcing harms to their health, safety, and abilities to selfactualize. We have acknowledged the deeply rooted and pervasive impacts of control creep as they manifest in six forms of exclusion that operate to limit or deny recognition and institutional and social protection of multiple intimate life arrangements -including partnerships, parenting, sexual identities and practices, and caregiving-and bodily autonomies, including access to health care, abortion and freedom to commodify one's body and bodily services (Roseneil et al 2012). In all these instances, the wide-ranging and far-reaching impacts of control creep further marginalize the most vulnerable sex workers.…”
Section: Control Creep and Its Combined Exclusionary Forcesmentioning
confidence: 99%