2017
DOI: 10.1109/tr.2017.2717488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remaining Useful Life Prediction for Degradation Processes With Memory Effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To obtain the degradation path function, the following assumptions are made: 1 n samples are randomly selected from products and the luminance D ij of the i th at time t ij can be expressed as Dij=D();;;titalicijθ1iθ2iθitalicki+εij(),,,;,,,0emi=10.5em20.5emn0.5emj=00.5em1Ni1 where D ( t ij ; θ 1 i ; θ 2 i ⋯; θ ki ) represents the degradation path function, θ ki is the parameter to be estimated, N i is the total test point of the i th sample, and k is the number of parameters. The test error ε ij follows the normal distribution, namely, εijitalicNormal(),0σεi2 2Suppose that D ( t ij ; θ 1 i ; θ 2 i ⋯; θ ki ) follows the three‐parameter Weibull distribution trueD¯()titalicij, then trueD¯()titalicij=1exp{}tijt0iβiαi in which α i = θ 2 i is a shape parameter, β i = θ 3 i is a scale parameter, and t 0 i = θ 1 i is a location parameter.…”
Section: Life Prediction Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To obtain the degradation path function, the following assumptions are made: 1 n samples are randomly selected from products and the luminance D ij of the i th at time t ij can be expressed as Dij=D();;;titalicijθ1iθ2iθitalicki+εij(),,,;,,,0emi=10.5em20.5emn0.5emj=00.5em1Ni1 where D ( t ij ; θ 1 i ; θ 2 i ⋯; θ ki ) represents the degradation path function, θ ki is the parameter to be estimated, N i is the total test point of the i th sample, and k is the number of parameters. The test error ε ij follows the normal distribution, namely, εijitalicNormal(),0σεi2 2Suppose that D ( t ij ; θ 1 i ; θ 2 i ⋯; θ ki ) follows the three‐parameter Weibull distribution trueD¯()titalicij, then trueD¯()titalicij=1exp{}tijt0iβiαi in which α i = θ 2 i is a shape parameter, β i = θ 3 i is a scale parameter, and t 0 i = θ 1 i is a location parameter.…”
Section: Life Prediction Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test error ε ij follows the normal distribution, namely, ε ij ∼ Normal 0; σ 2 ε i . 22 2) Suppose that D(t ij ; θ 1i ; θ 2i ⋯; θ ki ) follows the threeparameter Weibull distribution D t ij À Á , then…”
Section: Tpwrammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the conciseness and feasibility, the condition monitoring (CM) data–based methods are quite popular in RUL prediction. Specifically, without any demand of expert knowledge or extra experiments, data‐driven methods have occupied a significant place in the existing literature, such as the utilization of Brownian motion (BM, also refers to the Wiener process) and fractional Brownian motion (FBM) . These stochastic models possess remarkable similarities that their described degradation processes should follow the specified distribution forms, and hence would facilitate the identification of unknown parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, some progress has been made with respect to the non‐Markovian degradation modeling . The FBM was first employed to construct the diffusion process for the purpose of capturing the memory effects from the degradation path.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, BM is indeed a Markovian stochastic process. To address this deficiency, fractional Brownian motion (FBM) has been introduced into degradation modelling, FPT analysis, and RUL prediction . As a nonlinear extension of BM, FBM utilizes the Hurst exponent to describe the long‐term or short‐term dependency of degradation paths, and fits some non‐stationary diffusion processes in practical applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%