Reluctant policy innovation through profit concession and informality tolerance: A strategic relational view of policy entrepreneurship in China's urban redevelopment

Abstract

Summary This paper engages with the theoretical perspective of policy entrepreneurship to examine the pattern and process of policy change in the context of China's urban redevelopment. Drawing upon a strategic‐relational reinterpretation of policy entrepreneurship, this paper identifies a distinctive form of reluctant policy innovation in the “three old renewals” scheme initiated in Guangzhou where profit concession and informality tolerance were practiced to create a small window of opportunity for the project of urban redevelopment to break ground. The motivation of policy entrepreneurship in the successful urban renewal projects in Guangzhou was heavily contingent upon the geographically important location of the project site and the historically incidence of hosting the 2010 Asian Games, which forced municipal government to become entrepreneurial and innovative in decision making and income redistribution in order to get things done as quickly as possible. The distinct fashion of policy innovation identified in the case of Guangzhou points to the polymorphous and dynamic nature of policy entrepreneurship and advocates a relational treatment of the strategies and motives of policy entrepreneurs embedded in concrete geographical and historical context.

Linking strategic entrepreneurship to business growth in Iranian IoT-based companies

“…Adopting a strong SE allows firms to create, discover and exploit new opportunities and to capture value from doing so. The impact of SE on EOR is consistent with a few studies (Boudreaux, 2020;Hu et al, 2020). Likewise, this study found that EOR has a significant effect on BG.…”

“…The relationship between strategic entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial opportunity recognition A growing number of scholars have noted that SE is positively linked to EOR (Boudreaux, 2020;Hu et al, 2020). Altindag et al (2011) suggest that once SE is present, firms use entrepreneurial strategic actions to identify opportunities.…”

Welfare state and the social economy in compressed development: Self‐sufficiency organizations in South Korea

“…Policymaking is not necessarily a functional process of formulating solutions for meeting domestic needs but a result of policy learning (Dolowitz & Marsh, 2000;Jarvis & He, 2020;Hall, 1993). Ebbs and flows of the trends of economic policies, be it the Keynesian welfare state, state-centered developmentalism, or neoliberalism, can be contingent on the policy actors (Hu et al, 2020). Nevertheless, especially in a catch-up economy, rational policy actors, who calculate not only the technical efficiency of a policy instrument but also political effectiveness, may utilize these trends in "advanced economies" to advocate their policy alternative (Chindarkar et al, 2017;Evans, 2017).…”

Governing urban redevelopment: A case study of Yongqingfang in Guangzhou, China

“…The 'economic achievement is only one of many considerations in career advancement' (Wu, 2018(Wu, , p.1385 as local politics also shows significant concern for maintaining state power. This transformation of state-market-society interaction in urban redevelopment is argued to be a policy concession made by the state to mitigate social conflicts (Hu et al, 2020). Public participation is encouraged to legitimate redevelopment and help the implementation of redevelopment project.…”