2018
DOI: 10.1111/ijcs.12451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Religiosity, monitoring and consumer self‐control

Abstract: The studies herein build on the monitoring model of self‐control to examine how consumers’ religiosity influences their perceived monitoring by self, others, and God, and then how this monitoring influences consumption behavior in situations with surplus versus depleted self‐control resources. Study 1 finds that consumers higher in religiosity whose self‐control resources have been depleted (not depleted) report greater (lesser) self‐monitoring for behaviors that are deemed as high (low) in regulation importan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, our research contributes to the growing body of literature on religion's influence on consumption and response to marketing messaging (Hamelin et al, 2018;Mathras et al, 2016;Minton, 2015Minton, , 2018Muralidharan et al, 2017;Zehra & Minton, 2019), highlighting a need to better understand how religion and emotions come together in understanding consumer response to different message vehicles. Specifically, we explored the interesting conceptual distinction between passively and actively viewed marketing communications, stemming from prior research distinguishing between consumers' response to passive versus active information exposure (Higgs et al, 2009;Schneider & Currim, 1991;Talke & Heidenreich, 2014).…”
Section: Theoretical Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Additionally, our research contributes to the growing body of literature on religion's influence on consumption and response to marketing messaging (Hamelin et al, 2018;Mathras et al, 2016;Minton, 2015Minton, , 2018Muralidharan et al, 2017;Zehra & Minton, 2019), highlighting a need to better understand how religion and emotions come together in understanding consumer response to different message vehicles. Specifically, we explored the interesting conceptual distinction between passively and actively viewed marketing communications, stemming from prior research distinguishing between consumers' response to passive versus active information exposure (Higgs et al, 2009;Schneider & Currim, 1991;Talke & Heidenreich, 2014).…”
Section: Theoretical Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Religiosity influences consumers’ willingness to accept premium prices and willingness to adopt pro‐environmental behaviour (Hwang, 2018; Minton et al., 2018; Roshani Perera & Rathnasiri Hewege, 2018). The self‐control behaviour of customers is also influenced by religiosity (Minton, 2018), the effectiveness of marketing communication activities is also dependent on religiosity. Choi et al.…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, it seems plausible that this perspective would apply to crimes against wildlife as well. Similar research shows that religious consumers place greater priority on behaviors outside of animals and the environment, such that relationships with others and God are given higher priority (Heleski et al, 2005; Hui et al, 2014; Minton, 2018). In instances where crimes against wildlife and preservation of these relationships collide, consumers higher in religiosity may be more likely than those with lower levels of religiosity to commit crimes against wildlife.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%