2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2007.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Religiosity and participation in mutual-aid support groups for addiction

Abstract: Mutual-aid support groups play a vital role in substance abuse treatment in the United States. A national survey of mutual-aid support groups for addiction was conducted to identify key differences between participants in recovery groups. Survey data indicate that active involvement in support groups significantly improves one's chances of remaining clean and sober, regardless of the group in which one participates. Respondents whose individual beliefs better matched those of their primary support groups showe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
51
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While most of studies reviewed shown positive findings towards our hypothesis, the national survey conducted by Atkins and Hawdon [69] in their OLS regression where they explored the factors influencing recovery, religiosity or belief in a Higher Power, were found not significant (see Table 2.2). On the other hand the regression calculated for predicting program participation in mutual-aid support group, showed religiosity as a significant predictor for program participation, but it is recommended to take into account that in the survey there were more spiritual-related support groups than secular groups, which may be a source of bias when they interpreted these results.…”
Section: Cross-sectional Studiesmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…While most of studies reviewed shown positive findings towards our hypothesis, the national survey conducted by Atkins and Hawdon [69] in their OLS regression where they explored the factors influencing recovery, religiosity or belief in a Higher Power, were found not significant (see Table 2.2). On the other hand the regression calculated for predicting program participation in mutual-aid support group, showed religiosity as a significant predictor for program participation, but it is recommended to take into account that in the survey there were more spiritual-related support groups than secular groups, which may be a source of bias when they interpreted these results.…”
Section: Cross-sectional Studiesmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…For instance, samples tend to be big for this type of design; Atkins & Hawdon [69] performed a national survey in UUEE of mutual-aid support groups for addiction with 822 participants in different recovery groups, spirituality (AA, NA, WFS) and non-spirituality related (SMART & SOS). The main characteristics of the survey show a high percentage of white ethnicity participants followed by a considerable amount of female gender predominance (see Table 2.2), probably due to the inclusion of support groups like WFS which is a gender oriented support group with spiritual dimensions.…”
Section: Cross-sectional Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Mutual relationships involve not the giving or getting of competition, nor even the "giving and getting" of cooperation, but a very real and genuine giving by getting, getting by giving [126,127]. This, then, is a very special and even unique kind of between-ness.…”
Section: A Secular Spiritualitymentioning
confidence: 99%