Religiopolitical and Sociocultural Factors Shaping Creative Decisions in the Production of British and Malaysian Islamic Television

Abstract

By drawing on ethnographic data gathered from British and Malaysian Islamic television channels between 2012 and 2017, this article argues that different religiopolitical and sociocultural environments in which such television production workers as creative managers, producers and researchers exist, shape how they make creative decisions for religious programmes that they produced. This article points to the extent to which these television production workers from both the British and Malaysian television channels have various degrees of creative autonomy, and how 'limited' creative autonomy affects their working life. The results show that the creative managers and producers of British Muslim television channel have lesser autonomy than their Malaysian counterparts. The clash between the Western and Islamic cultures and intergenerational clash are mainly the forms of religiopolitical and sociocultural factors that shape the creative autonomy in Islamic television production in Britain. Such representational issues relating to religious personalities, music artists and performances, and women, are among the constraints that these workers faced. By contrast, creative managers and producers in Malaysia, have some degree of autonomy. Unlike their British colleagues, religiopolitical and sociocultural factors concerning identity politics have less implication for their working life. Nonetheless, despite having a higher level of creative autonomy than their British equals, their creative decisions often are driven by the notion of giving what audiences want. Such commercial pressures as audience ratings and advertising force are the primary factors that shape the creative autonomy of managers and producers of Islamic programmes in Malaysia.

Factors Pressuring Worker’s Personal Wellbeing At Media Workplace Environment

“…Sociocultural, religiopolitical and technological factors have changed the working life in creative industries (Karim & Ahmad, 2018). The Fourth Industrial Revolution (IR 4.0) has not only also affected the health but also the emotional wellbeing of media production workers (Karim, 2019).…”

“…In order to map the factors pressuring media workers at their workplace, the conceptual framework of this article is based on literature from media sociology and cultural studies tradition that explores media production and creative labour. A combination of these traditions offers a better understanding of the working life and dynamics of power in the creative industries (Hesmondhalgh, 2013) and factors that shape the creative decisions in media workplace (Karim, 2015;Karim & Ahmad, 2018). Moreover, it also suggests how technological challenge affect creative labour (Karim, 2019).…”

The Failure of Implementation Broadcasting Regulations in Indonesia-Malaysia Border Region: Case Study on Free-to-air Television in Meranti Regency, Riau Province - Indonesia

“…This one implied by the assumptions of the theory that built where media content has no essential meaning, so it does not explain the use of media or exposure to media messages to the public. Nevertheless, rather the assumption on the theory that humans construct the meaning of media and text technology within a framework of collective understanding (Littlejhon & Foss, 2009;Schoening & Anderson, 1995). Viewers collectively parse symbols, texts in television shows (Jensen, 1990) so that the use of broadcast technology in this case television has concrete implications in the process of decomposing symbols and texts that become a reference in social action.…”

“…The theory of social action media studies looks at the phenomenon of communication not on media content so that media content has no essential meaning, does not explain the use of media or media effects originating from media exposure. This theory starts the assumption that humans construct the meaning of media and text technology within a framework of collective understanding (Littlejhon & Foss, 2009;Schoening & Anderson, 1995).…”

“…Gerard Schoenring and James Anderson (1995) make clear boundaries on social action media research where meaning not contained from the message but results from an interpretive process in the audience (Littlejhon & Foss, 2009). The purpose of media messages and programs not to determined passively but actively produced by the audience, meaning they do something with what they see and read.…”