1972
DOI: 10.2307/3269740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Religionswissenschaft or Religiology?

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. BRILL is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Numen.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Também Pummer (1972), pesquisador do Department of Classics and Religious Studies da University of Ottawa, Canada, adverte àqueles que pretendem utilizar o termo religiologia como um campo de estudos simultaneamente histórico e teológico, teórico e aplicado, devendo, nesse caso ser estabelecida uma clara fronteira entre Religiologia e a Religionswissenschaft. Nesse caso, concordando com as advertências do autor, tratam-se, obviamente de estudos distintos.…”
unclassified
“…Também Pummer (1972), pesquisador do Department of Classics and Religious Studies da University of Ottawa, Canada, adverte àqueles que pretendem utilizar o termo religiologia como um campo de estudos simultaneamente histórico e teológico, teórico e aplicado, devendo, nesse caso ser estabelecida uma clara fronteira entre Religiologia e a Religionswissenschaft. Nesse caso, concordando com as advertências do autor, tratam-se, obviamente de estudos distintos.…”
unclassified
“…For the past few decades, international English-language publications, learned associations and the electronic media have provided forums where scholars from North America and English-speaking Europe increasingly share information about the local experiences of Religious Studies programs and discuss the issues pertaining specifically to the academic study of religion (Warne 2004: 14). Over the years, Canadian scholars have taken an active part in all the major theoretical and methodological debates concerning the study of religion, whether those debates centred on disciplinarity (Bourgault 1970;King 1984: 132 and passim; McCutcheon 1998;Pummer 1972), the definition of religion (Arnal 2000: 23-24; Berger 1971: 96 and passim; Chagnon 1986; Despland 1999: 505;M6nard 1994;Rousseau 1980: 89) or the institutional and economic status of Religious Studies academic units (Badertscher et al 1993;Despland 1988;Juschka 1999;McCutcheon 1998;Nefsky 1995;Remus et al 1992; Rousseau and Remus 1999). A quick look at international publications focussed on these issues may leave one with the idea that the problems encountered in practicing the academic study of religion are largely shared, at least throughout Canada, the United States and English-speaking Europe.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%