Reliable recognition of lying, sitting, and standing with a hip‐worn accelerometer

Abstract

Hip-worn accelerometers are widely used to estimate physical activity (PA), but the accuracy of acceleration threshold-based analysis is compromised when it comes to identifying stationary and sedentary behaviors, let alone classifying body postures into lying, sitting, or standing. The purpose of this study was to devise a novel method for accurate classification of body posture using triaxial data from hip-worn accelerometer and to evaluate its performance in free-living conditions against a thigh-worn accelerometer. The posture classification rested on 2 facts: constant Earth's gravity vector and upright walking posture. Thirty healthy adults wore a hip-mounted accelerometer and underwent an array of lying, sitting, standing, and walking tasks.Task type, their order, and length were randomly assigned to each participant. During walking, the accelerometer orientation in terms of gravity vector was taken as reference, and the angle for posture estimation (APE) was determined from the incident accelerometer orientation in relation to the reference vector. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve yielded an optimal cut-point APE of 64.9° (sensitivity 100% and specificity 100%) for lying and sitting and 11.6° (94.2%; 94.5%) for sitting and standing. In free-living conditions, high agreement (89.2% for original results and 90.4% for median-filtered results) in identifying sedentary periods (sitting and lying) was observed between the results from hip-and thigh-worn accelerometers. Walking provides a valid reference activity to determine the body posture. The proposed APE analysis of the raw data from hip-worn triaxial accelerometer gives accurate and specific information about daily times spent lying, sitting, and standing. K E Y W O R D Sbody posture, objective measurement, physical activity, sedentary behavior, walking

Objectively measured physical activity profile and cognition in Finnish elderly twins

“…Ambulatory activities were classified as LPA and MVPA according to the estimated MET level. Stationary activities were classified as lying, sitting, and standing using the recent validated method based on angle for posture estimation [19].…”

Motives for physical activity in older men and women: A twin study using accelerometer‐measured physical activity

“…Together, these metrics provide about 90% accuracy in assessing the intensity, volume and distribution of daily physical activity separating sedentary and stationary behaviors (ie, lying, sitting and standing) from any physical activity behavior. [26][27][28] For the analysis, MAD and APE values were determined for each 6 second epoch. The epoch-wise MAD values were expressed in metabolic equivalents (MET), and a 1-minute exponential moving average of the MET values was calculated to estimate incident energy consumption.…”

Diet Macronutrient Composition, Physical Activity, and Body Composition in Soldiers During 6 Months Deployment

“…standing and sitting/lying (metabolic equivalent, MET < 1.5), and for physical activity, e.g. step count, number of breaks during SB, MET mean, MET max (/min), light PA (MET 1.5-3.0) and moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA, MET > 3.0) (12,13).…”