2021
DOI: 10.47059/revistageintec.v11i3.2014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability, Validity, and Norm References of Standing Broad Jump

Abstract: Standing Broad Jump (SBJ) is a field test used to assess leg power. This study aims to determine the reliability, validity, and develop norm reference among adolescents. The evidence of the reliability, validity, norm need to establish in the particular population to support the interpretation of the scores. This study involved 60 subjects and six raters for reliability and validity. 417 subjects for norm development. The ICC, test-retest, and Pearson Correlation were used to determine the reliability. Indepen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(16 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the broad jump, procedures were similar to previous research, suggesting good reliability and validity of this assessment (1,12). Athletes began from a standing position and jumped as far as possible horizontally.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…For the broad jump, procedures were similar to previous research, suggesting good reliability and validity of this assessment (1,12). Athletes began from a standing position and jumped as far as possible horizontally.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Students had to perform a maximal forward jump from a standing position by bending their knees and using an arm swing. The test was performed for three trials with 20–30 s of rest in between, and the best result (longest jump) was taken in the analysis [ 42 , 43 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The longest jump distance was used for statistical analyses. This procedure provides acceptable reliability, with a reported intertrial difference of 0.3 ± 12.9 cm (Ortega et al, 2008) and an intraclass correlation of 0.97 (Rahman et al, 2021). Broad jump length was determined by distance from the starting line at the tip of the feet and the heel of the foot, which landed closer to the starting line.…”
Section: Broad Jumpmentioning
confidence: 99%