1978
DOI: 10.1080/00256307.1978.12022156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of the CMI Attitude Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1979
1979
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Crites (1973) reported a mean Kuder-Richardson 20 reliability estimate for the CMI-At of .74. Hanna and Neely (1978) reported a comparable KR 20 estimate of .70. Jepsen and Prediger's (1981) factor analysis of career development assessment instruments indicated the CMI-At to be correlated with two of four career decision-making factors: Cognitive Resources for Decision Malung and Decision-Makmg Certainty.…”
Section: Dependent Measure and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Crites (1973) reported a mean Kuder-Richardson 20 reliability estimate for the CMI-At of .74. Hanna and Neely (1978) reported a comparable KR 20 estimate of .70. Jepsen and Prediger's (1981) factor analysis of career development assessment instruments indicated the CMI-At to be correlated with two of four career decision-making factors: Cognitive Resources for Decision Malung and Decision-Makmg Certainty.…”
Section: Dependent Measure and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 82%