2021
DOI: 10.1177/0271678x211020589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of task-specific neuronal activation assessed with functional PET, ASL and BOLD imaging

Abstract: Mapping the neuronal response during cognitive processing is of crucial importance to gain new insights into human brain function. BOLD imaging and ASL are established MRI methods in this endeavor. Recently, the novel approach of functional PET (fPET) was introduced, enabling absolute quantification of glucose metabolism at rest and during task execution in a single measurement. Here, we report test-retest reliability of fPET in direct comparison to BOLD imaging and ASL. Twenty healthy subjects underwent two P… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, they did not compare bolus-infusion with either constant infusion or bolus administration. In a subsequent study from the same group, Riscka et al [ 18 ] demonstrated excellent reliability of fPET at rest with 20% bolus 80% infusion administration; reliability of fPET reduced during task performance; and lowest reliability for BOLD-fMRI during rest and task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they did not compare bolus-infusion with either constant infusion or bolus administration. In a subsequent study from the same group, Riscka et al [ 18 ] demonstrated excellent reliability of fPET at rest with 20% bolus 80% infusion administration; reliability of fPET reduced during task performance; and lowest reliability for BOLD-fMRI during rest and task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they did not compare bolus-infusion to either constant infusion or bolus administration. In a subsequent study from the same group, Riscka et al[17] demonstrated excellent reliability of fPET at rest with 20% bolus 80% infusion administration; reliability of fPET reduced during task performance; and was lowest for BOLD-fMRI during rest and task.…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As no longitudinal MCM studies are available, the sample size was based on previous cross-sectional work using this technique (Hahn et al, 2020;Riedl et al, 2016). Parts of this sample were already included in previous studies for the assessment of cross-sectional data (Hahn et al, 2020) and test-retest reliability (Rischka et al, 2021). At the screening visit, general health of all subjects was ensured through a routine medical examination performed by an experienced psychiatrist, including blood tests, electrocardiography, neurological testing (comprising examinations of mental status, cranial nerves, motor system, deep tendon reflexes, sensation, cerebellum) and the structural clinical interview for DSM-IV.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This multimodal approach has been shown to provide the best model fit (Rischka et al, 2018). Furthermore, including the BOLD changes in the baseline definition does not affect fPET task effects (Rischka et al, 2018) or their test-retest reliability (Rischka et al, 2021). For absolute quantification of glucose metabolism, the Patlak plot was applied to calculate the influx constant, Ki.…”
Section: Cerebral Metabolic Rate Of Glucose Metabolism (Cmrglu)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation