2009
DOI: 10.1097/wnp.0b013e3181baaaea
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of Superficial Peroneal, Sural, and Medial Plantar Nerve Conduction Studies

Abstract: Although the Bland-Altman method confirmed a good intra- and interrater reliability of the studied nerves, ICC analyses showed mixed results. These statistical approaches are complementary, and each one has advantages and disadvantages that must be considered in their application and interpretation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(61 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are comparable to reproducibility studies on younger, less diverse study populations, which found ICCs for peroneal motor NCV between 0.52 and 0.89 (Bird, Brown, 2006, Dyck, Norell, 2007, Herrera, Camargo, 2009). Our sample had overall ICCs for NCV ranging from 0.75–0.90.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results are comparable to reproducibility studies on younger, less diverse study populations, which found ICCs for peroneal motor NCV between 0.52 and 0.89 (Bird, Brown, 2006, Dyck, Norell, 2007, Herrera, Camargo, 2009). Our sample had overall ICCs for NCV ranging from 0.75–0.90.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Test-retest reliability, otherwise known as reproducibility, is a necessary component of accuracy. Moderate to high reproducibility has been found for peroneal motor NC in healthy (Herrera et al, 2009, Loseth et al, 2007) and diabetic populations (Bird et al, 2006, Dyck et al, 2003, Dyck et al, 2007); however, these studies included few older adults and lacked racial diversity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The level of reproducibility of the point-of-care device appeared to be comparable to reproducibility measures from standard NCS. [30] However, while quantitative accuracy was excellent for SNAP, we observe a systematic overestimation of SNCV by the point-of-care device. From this measurement bias, we determined that adjustment of threshold values is required – either automatically within the programming of the device or in the published normative values for the device - to adequately reflect those of standard NCS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The good reliability of these recording techniques repeatedly administered by the same examiner has been previously established 25,29 . Surface electrodes were used to stimulate and record nerve responses.…”
Section: A B Cmentioning
confidence: 99%