2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of short-term measurements of heart rate variability: Findings from a longitudinal study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As underlined by many authors, there are still substantial methodological inconsistencies throughout the literature regarding HRV in sports science that limit comparison [ 4 , 18 , 93 ]. Moreover, the authors of a recent study on test-retest reliability of short-term HRV parameters suggested that the studies differ with respect to important methodological issues and evidence on this topic is far from clear [ 54 ]. There are several methodological characteristics that may cause differences in findings among studies on HRV reliability, e.g., reliability statistics adopted, number of tests performed and the time interval between them, and sample heterogeneity [ 54 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As underlined by many authors, there are still substantial methodological inconsistencies throughout the literature regarding HRV in sports science that limit comparison [ 4 , 18 , 93 ]. Moreover, the authors of a recent study on test-retest reliability of short-term HRV parameters suggested that the studies differ with respect to important methodological issues and evidence on this topic is far from clear [ 54 ]. There are several methodological characteristics that may cause differences in findings among studies on HRV reliability, e.g., reliability statistics adopted, number of tests performed and the time interval between them, and sample heterogeneity [ 54 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the authors of a recent study on test-retest reliability of short-term HRV parameters suggested that the studies differ with respect to important methodological issues and evidence on this topic is far from clear [ 54 ]. There are several methodological characteristics that may cause differences in findings among studies on HRV reliability, e.g., reliability statistics adopted, number of tests performed and the time interval between them, and sample heterogeneity [ 54 ]. Lack of information about other methodological aspects also limits potential for study replication and confidence in interpretation [ 52 , 53 ], such as the lack of information on ECG acquisition and processing, including device, software, recording duration and conditions, breathing control, and position during recordings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…relative) is not surprising. Indeed, others have highlighted poor absolute reliability of HRV estimates but more acceptable relative reliability (Pinna et al., 2007; Sandercock, Bromley, & Brodie, 2005; Uhlig, Meylan, & Rudolph, 2020). Our data support these previous findings, and indicate that while there is a considerable amount of measurement error involved in HRV analysis (as indicated by the absolute reliability), the ability to discriminate between individuals in the group (i.e.…”
Section: Discussion and Practical Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%