Abstract:Intra- and inter-rater reliability of SWE is fair to excellent according to ICCs. SWE reliability is influenced appreciably by acquisition technique. Nevertheless, CORs for SWE are not negligible. To determine whether these results are acceptable clinically, further research is required to establish SWE stiffness values of normal and pathological tissues in the neck.
“…The present results were slightly higher than in previous studies showing an interoperator ICC of 0.72-0.97 and intraoperator ICC of 0.78-0.98. 28,[36][37][38] On the other hand, the reproducibility of strain sonoelastography is considered to be dependent on the operators' skill. Previous studies examining in vivo the muscle, kidney and heart indicated an interoperator ICC of 0.72-0.89 and intraoperator ICC of 0.47-0.96.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28,[34][35][36][37][38] Regarding the masseter muscle, its hardness in patients with temporomandibular disorder accompanied by myofascial pain has been clarified to be greater than those of healthy volunteers. 11,12,14 The difference between the left and right hardness of the masseter muscles in patients was greater.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique is expected to lead to a reduction in operator dependency, high reproducibility and quantitative evaluation. 28,[34][35][36][37][38] However, there are few reports on available normative values of in vivo tissue in head and neck fields. 24 The first purpose of this study was to experimentally clarify the reliability on measurement using shear-wave sonoelastography compared with strain sonoelastography with the use of muscle phantoms that sufficiently covered the actual hardness of the human masseter muscle at clenching.…”
Objectives: Shear-wave sonoelastography is expected to facilitate low operator dependency, high reproducibility and quantitative evaluation, whereas there are few reports on available normative values of in vivo tissue in head and neck fields. The purpose of this study was to examine the reliabilities on measuring hardness using shear-wave sonoelastography and to clarify normal values of masseter muscle hardness in healthy volunteers. Methods: Phantoms with known hardness ranging from 20 to 140 kPa were scanned with shear-wave sonoelastography, and inter-and intraoperator reliabilities were examined compared with strain sonoelastography. The relationships between the actual and measured hardness were analyzed. The masseter muscle hardness in 30 healthy volunteers was measured using shear-wave sonoelastography. Results: The inter-and intraoperator intraclass correlation coefficients were almost perfect. Strong correlations were seen between the actual and measured hardness. The mean hardness of the masseter muscles in healthy volunteers was 42.82 ± 5.56 kPa at rest and 53.36 ± 8.46 kPa during jaw clenching. Conclusions: The hardness measured with shear-wave sonoelastography showed high-level reliability. Shear-wave sonoelastography may be suitable for evaluation of the masseter muscles.
“…The present results were slightly higher than in previous studies showing an interoperator ICC of 0.72-0.97 and intraoperator ICC of 0.78-0.98. 28,[36][37][38] On the other hand, the reproducibility of strain sonoelastography is considered to be dependent on the operators' skill. Previous studies examining in vivo the muscle, kidney and heart indicated an interoperator ICC of 0.72-0.89 and intraoperator ICC of 0.47-0.96.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28,[34][35][36][37][38] Regarding the masseter muscle, its hardness in patients with temporomandibular disorder accompanied by myofascial pain has been clarified to be greater than those of healthy volunteers. 11,12,14 The difference between the left and right hardness of the masseter muscles in patients was greater.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique is expected to lead to a reduction in operator dependency, high reproducibility and quantitative evaluation. 28,[34][35][36][37][38] However, there are few reports on available normative values of in vivo tissue in head and neck fields. 24 The first purpose of this study was to experimentally clarify the reliability on measurement using shear-wave sonoelastography compared with strain sonoelastography with the use of muscle phantoms that sufficiently covered the actual hardness of the human masseter muscle at clenching.…”
Objectives: Shear-wave sonoelastography is expected to facilitate low operator dependency, high reproducibility and quantitative evaluation, whereas there are few reports on available normative values of in vivo tissue in head and neck fields. The purpose of this study was to examine the reliabilities on measuring hardness using shear-wave sonoelastography and to clarify normal values of masseter muscle hardness in healthy volunteers. Methods: Phantoms with known hardness ranging from 20 to 140 kPa were scanned with shear-wave sonoelastography, and inter-and intraoperator reliabilities were examined compared with strain sonoelastography. The relationships between the actual and measured hardness were analyzed. The masseter muscle hardness in 30 healthy volunteers was measured using shear-wave sonoelastography. Results: The inter-and intraoperator intraclass correlation coefficients were almost perfect. Strong correlations were seen between the actual and measured hardness. The mean hardness of the masseter muscles in healthy volunteers was 42.82 ± 5.56 kPa at rest and 53.36 ± 8.46 kPa during jaw clenching. Conclusions: The hardness measured with shear-wave sonoelastography showed high-level reliability. Shear-wave sonoelastography may be suitable for evaluation of the masseter muscles.
“…In this context, elastography is thought to add valuable information about the tissue stiffness and, consequently, the potential malignancy of a lesion. Although strain elastography is often described as operator dependent because of the manual compression performed during the measurement, more recently developed techniques for SWE are supposed to be independent of the examiner because the push pulses are generated automatically (Badea et al 2013a;Bhatia et al 2012aBhatia et al , 2013aBhatia et al , 2013b. Numerous descriptions of successful application of SWE have been reported, for example, in the liver, thyroid, breast and prostate (Au et al 2014;Beland et al 2014;Cebi Olgun et al 2014;Fukuhara et al 2014;Lin et al 2014;Woo et al 2014).…”
“…Previous studies suggest ARFI elastography as a useful tool in the differentiation of malign and benign thyroid nodules with or without in combination with gray-scale ultrasonography fi ndings [10][11][12].…”
Ectopic intrathyroidal thymus is caused by a hesitate in the migration of thymus during embryogenesis and is a rare cause of a nodular intrathyroidal lesion. Nodular thyroid lesions raise the suspicion of malignancy in the pediatric age group. Although rare, ectopic intrathyroidal thymus is usually misdiagnosed as a thyroid nodule and in addition to ultrasonography, further imaging techniques including MRI is performed. Fine needle aspiration biopsy or surgical excision, are also included in the management in thyroid nodules, because of the possibility of a malignancy. Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse-Imaging (ARFI) is a new method determining the tissue elasticity using short duration acoustic pulces and exciting the tissue in the selected region of interest. Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse-Imaging had been used in the differentiation of malign and benign thyroid nodules with or without in combination with gray-scale ultrasonography fi ndings. We here present a case of intrathyroidal ectopic thymus in a 4 year-old boy diagnosed with the use of Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse-Imaging in addition to gray scale and Doppler ultrasonography fi ndings.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.