1944
DOI: 10.2307/1125533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of Rorschach Scoring Categories with Preschool Children

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1949
1949
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(3 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are two problems here: whether personality structure is indeed an unchanging function, and whether the projective technique taps basic personality structure alone and is uninfluenced by any other factors, either pertinent dynamic factors or those pertaining to accidents of the test situation. As might be expected, studies with children, such as those reported by Kerr (1934) and Swift (1944), show changes when test and retest are separated by a considerable time interval, .as, indeed, they must be if a pseudo-reliability is not to be introduced in terms of a memory factor. On the other hand, Brosin & Fromm (1942) report considerable stability in Rorschach performance in serial retesting through psycho-analytic treatment.…”
Section: Problems Relating To R E L I a B I L I~mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…There are two problems here: whether personality structure is indeed an unchanging function, and whether the projective technique taps basic personality structure alone and is uninfluenced by any other factors, either pertinent dynamic factors or those pertaining to accidents of the test situation. As might be expected, studies with children, such as those reported by Kerr (1934) and Swift (1944), show changes when test and retest are separated by a considerable time interval, .as, indeed, they must be if a pseudo-reliability is not to be introduced in terms of a memory factor. On the other hand, Brosin & Fromm (1942) report considerable stability in Rorschach performance in serial retesting through psycho-analytic treatment.…”
Section: Problems Relating To R E L I a B I L I~mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The case for the validity of the Rorschach Group Test rests upon the evidence for the individual test (23,24,33). The reliability of the Rorschach Test has been studied using both test-retest and split-half methods, with results permitting confiding interpretations (15,19,20,27,55,59).…”
Section: Rorschach Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Test has been ascertained as .34 (59), .81 (20), .69 (15), and .68 (55). No apparent reason seemed to explain these discrepancies.…”
Section: Reliability Of Color Responses In the Rorschachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Useful studies could certainly be made, however, by comparing performance on two sets of inkblots without shock (cf. Swift,57). Even if the two sets are not strictly equivalent, the data would indicate more about the stability of performance than any methods so far employed.…”
Section: Correlation and Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%