2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of Objective Voice Measures of Normal Speaking Voices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
42
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These data are consistent with studies of the adult voice, which show that fundamental frequency is stable in repeated voice recordings of both sustained vowel and continuous speech. [14][15][16] It reproduces results from Hill et al, 13 which also demonstrated consistency of F 0 across sustained vowel recordings in the pediatric population.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These data are consistent with studies of the adult voice, which show that fundamental frequency is stable in repeated voice recordings of both sustained vowel and continuous speech. [14][15][16] It reproduces results from Hill et al, 13 which also demonstrated consistency of F 0 across sustained vowel recordings in the pediatric population.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This phenomenon has been demonstrated in both adult and pediatric populations. 13,14,16 In adults, this lack of recording reliability has been attributed to ambient noise, sex differences, hormonal change, time of day, mood, and caffeine intake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately 30% of the US population experiences dysphonia at some time in their life, which can be treated with medical, behavioral, and/or surgical interventions . For patients with voice disorders, objective outcome measures (such as acoustic and aerodynamic assessments) are sufficient for distinguishing normal from disordered voices . However, they have demonstrated poor reliability and sensitivity to change .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, subharmonics create 'noise' in the signal that make it impossible to measure features that depend upon a periodic signal [41,42,43]. Although jitter and shimmer have been linked to perceptions of roughness and breathiness, respectively [19], several studies have concluded that they are unreliable indicators of voice quality [41,44,45,46], especially for voices perceived to score highly on measures of Grade, a measure of perceived hoarseness [14]. Furthermore, jitter and shimmer can present as normal in voices that contain subharmonics [47] and are unreliable for diplophonic voices [48,49].…”
Section: Perturbation Measures and Perceived Voice Qualitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%