1989
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.1989.41.467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of Detection of Microfilariae in Skin Snips in the Diagnosis of Onchocerciasis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
60
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference was most likely due to the different ways in which the skin biopsies were examined. The traditional method (as used by Raccurt et al 1982) involves incubating the skin biopsy in a suitable fluid and then counting the number of microfilariae which emerge, but it has been established for O. volvulus that many microfilariae remain inside the biopsy and are therefore undetected (Schulz-Key, 1978 ;Taylor et al 1989). The molecular method on the other hand involves the extraction of DNA from the whole (unincubated) skin biopsy and the subsequent detection of parasite DNA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference was most likely due to the different ways in which the skin biopsies were examined. The traditional method (as used by Raccurt et al 1982) involves incubating the skin biopsy in a suitable fluid and then counting the number of microfilariae which emerge, but it has been established for O. volvulus that many microfilariae remain inside the biopsy and are therefore undetected (Schulz-Key, 1978 ;Taylor et al 1989). The molecular method on the other hand involves the extraction of DNA from the whole (unincubated) skin biopsy and the subsequent detection of parasite DNA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, reduced microfiladermia is accompanied by reduced sensitivity of skin snip microscopy. 8 Thus, IVM MDA and the associated sustained suppression of microfiladermia are expected to further reduce the sensitivity of skin snip microscopy in later stages of program M and E. 7,9 Moreover, sensitivity of skin snip microscopy is also known to be limited in hypoendemic areas, further calling into question its utility for mapping as elimination programs expand to include regions of reduced endemicity. 10 Here we describe the design and evaluation of a singlestep DNA-based method to detect patent O. volvulus infection in skin snips as an alternative to microscopic evaluation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Definitive proof of active infection due to O. volvulus is by microscopic demonstration of worms in skin snips or in nodules surgically excised from suspects. Unfortunately, the commonly used skin snip method is insensitive in low transmission areas and in areas where long-term use of the microfilaricidal ivermectin has resulted in significant reduction of both individual and community skin microfilariae loads (Taylor et al (1989); Newell (1997)), with a consequential reduction in the prevalence of most signs and symptoms of the disease. Furthermore, the skin snip procedure is painful and involves a high risk of bloodborne infections (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%