1970
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1970.00770040228010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of Cytologic Smear in Diagnosis of Oral Cancer: A Controlled Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6,8,9 Cytological studies may be useful as a screening tool for the assessment of cellular changes in apparently normal mucosa, in which case a biopsy is not indicated. 6,8,9 Cytological studies may be useful as a screening tool for the assessment of cellular changes in apparently normal mucosa, in which case a biopsy is not indicated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6,8,9 Cytological studies may be useful as a screening tool for the assessment of cellular changes in apparently normal mucosa, in which case a biopsy is not indicated. 6,8,9 Cytological studies may be useful as a screening tool for the assessment of cellular changes in apparently normal mucosa, in which case a biopsy is not indicated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 For ethical reasons, these studies used material from necropsy 3 or animals. [5][6][7][8][9] However, studies using the Papanicolaou & Traut classification system have not reported significant results to recommend this method as a tool for early detection of precursor lesions in oral mucosal cells of individuals at risk of squamous cell carcinoma. [5][6][7][8][9] However, studies using the Papanicolaou & Traut classification system have not reported significant results to recommend this method as a tool for early detection of precursor lesions in oral mucosal cells of individuals at risk of squamous cell carcinoma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of authors have suggested reasons for this including: inadequate sampling, technical error, misinterpretation of the findings and bias5.13.14. [16][17][18]. It is important that techniques are developed to aid in the diagnosis of early oral cancer especially in predicting the behaviour of those lesions which display epithelial dysplasia but no overt malignancy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A positive result is defined as definitive cellular evidence of epithelial dysplasia or carcinoma and atypical result is defined as abnormal epithelial changes of uncertain diagnostic significance (Maraki, Becker, and Boecking 2004). Studies from 1950 to 1970s reported high false negative results for exfoliative cytology (Folsom et al 1972;Shklar, Cataldo, and Meyer 1970;Rovin 1967). For example Folsom et all reported 37% false negative result in 148 oral lesions (Folsom et al 1972).…”
Section: Oral Exfoliative Cytologymentioning
confidence: 99%