2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2007.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of a Perinatal Outcomes Measure: The Optimality Index–US

Abstract: The Optimality Index-US, a recently developed perinatal clinimetric index, has been validated with both clinical and research databases. Documentation of the reliability of the instrument for medical record abstraction is needed. This paper reports outcomes of interrater reliability assessments conducted for two projects. Abstraction was supervised by the same investigator, but staffed by different coders who had a variety of qualifications (perinatal nurse, nurse-midwife, clinical trial professional, student … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This methodology may be more likely to yield a reliable response to the questioning than may be possible in the prenatal care setting. Chart review processes in the parent study also were developed to a point of excellent reliability (≥90% inter‐rater agreement), and ongoing audits indicate that quality of abstraction remains high 68 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This methodology may be more likely to yield a reliable response to the questioning than may be possible in the prenatal care setting. Chart review processes in the parent study also were developed to a point of excellent reliability (≥90% inter‐rater agreement), and ongoing audits indicate that quality of abstraction remains high 68 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 Thus, individual items would be given the same score (0 vs 1) if the form were completed again (prior to any actual change occurring). 34 Thus, individual items would be given the same score (0 vs 1) if the form were completed again (prior to any actual change occurring).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reliability was established early in the project by training, creating decision tools, and revising the form until inter-rater agreement reached 92.7% (Seng, Mugisha, & Miller, 2008). A five percent audit over the life of the project resulted in 94.4% agreement, which is considered excellent reliability (Waltz, Strickland, & Lenz, 1991).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%