Reliability of a freehand three-dimensional ultrasonic device allowing anatomical orientation “at a glance”: Study protocol for 3D measurements with Curefab CS®

Abstract

Background and Purpose: 3D ultrasonic measurement of carotid atherosclerotic lesions has emerged as an important tool for research and patient management. We sought to evaluate the accuracy and the reliability of a new easy-to-use magnetically tracked freehand 3D ultrasonic device with quick reconstruction time, allowing for anatomical orientation "at a glance" for calibration and distance measurements, with unique usability as a combined tool for image acquisition, registration and measurement within 3-D ultrasonic (US) volumes, which is furthermore connectable to every conventional US-machine. To enable a complete evaluation of the whole system, three different key points had to be addressed: the reproducibility of the calibration procedure, the absolute accuracy of the whole system and a direct comparison to CT and MRI imaging modalities. Materials and Methods:For validating our calibration method, a set of 6 calibrations was performed; each consisting of 6 records of a pyramid phantom taken from different positions and angles. To evaluate the accuracy of the whole 3D-ultrasound system, the point reconstruction accuracy and the distance accuracy were determined in a point phantom made out of a single metal wire vertically attached to the bottom of a plastic tub filled with water. For distance measurements, a precisely manufactured plastic tube phantom was scanned and the length between fixed landmarks on the tube was measured. In a final step, 3D US records acquired with Curefab CS were compared to CT and MRI scans; for this purpose all ultrasonic data was manually registered to the CT/MRI data. Results: Concerning calibration precision the tested Curefab CS system performs state of the art compared to reviews of recent freehand 3D-Ultrasound calibration methods. The point reconstruction measure for evaluation of system accuracy retrieved a mean point accuracy of 1.52 mm in contrast to values ranging from 1.67 to 3.63 mm. Mean total error of distance measurements was 0.9% with standard deviation 0.56% in our study, compared with values reaching from about 1% up to 2.3% in other studies on this subject. All quantitative measurement results are listed in a summarized form in www.sciedu.ca/jbgc Journal of Biomedical Graphics and Computing, December 2012, Vol. 2, No. 2 ISSN 1925-4008 E-ISSN 1925 2 Table 1. Besides quantitative evaluation, 3D-ultrasound records acquired with the Curefab CS system were also compared to CT and MRI scans of patients (see Figure 3 and Figure 4). The alignment of both image modalities showed promising results for future development of diagnostic tools using all image data. Discussion and Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that 3D measurements with Curefab CS are feasible with satisfactory reliability and accuracy. From the results gathered in our study we conclude that 3D-imaging with Curefab CS might start off the possibility of accurate visualization, volume measurement, carotid plaque characterization and identification of vulnerable plaques in the very near future.

Carotid plaque volume in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy

“…Multiplanar reconstructions were computed to produce 3D ultrasound volumes. System accuracy had been proven previously with phantom studies registered with CT and MRI. CPV was calculated by tracing the luminal surface and the adventitia at an interslice distance of 1 mm.…”

Electromagnetic Tracking in Medicine—A Review of Technology, Validation, and Applications

“…6-B. US probes also have been tracked electromagnetically to enable 3D US by combining multiple 2D US scans from different directions into a 3D image [33]. Especially for laparoscopic US, this approach was proposed by several groups, [42,190] because line-of-sight is unavailable.…”

3D Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound for Detecting Endoleak Following Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR)

“…This technology uses a motion tracking mini-GPS (global positioning system) with a magnetic field emitter and two tracking sensors that transform standard 2D CEUS images into high-definition 3D format. 12 These instruments utilise positional information from magnetic field emitters to place and orientate the transducer probe precisely in time and space. Unlike conventional ultrasound, where a small number of representative 2D images taken from the many thousand generated during an average 10 minute scan are used for diagnosis, all the acquired 2D information is utilised to construct a high-definition 3D image.…”