2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of 3-D ultrasound measurements of cervical lymph node volume

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the technical literature contains numerous detailed examples of 3D algorithms for reducing speckle and improving image quality, [8][9][10][11] there is relatively little information available on the commercial image processing techniques employed in practice, such as Speckle Reduction Imaging (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI), Xtreme Resolution (Philips Healthcare, Bothell, WA) and, indeed, the meth-ods evaluated in this paper (GOPView and GOPiCE). 6,7,[12][13][14] Currently, the use of such techniques seems to be more of a preference issue for individual physicians rather than established clinical practice. The reliance on proprietary information in commercial image processing techniques makes it very difficult for clinicians to assess the merits of one method over the other, especially as these algorithms are implemented on different scanners, which would confound comparative results even further.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the technical literature contains numerous detailed examples of 3D algorithms for reducing speckle and improving image quality, [8][9][10][11] there is relatively little information available on the commercial image processing techniques employed in practice, such as Speckle Reduction Imaging (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI), Xtreme Resolution (Philips Healthcare, Bothell, WA) and, indeed, the meth-ods evaluated in this paper (GOPView and GOPiCE). 6,7,[12][13][14] Currently, the use of such techniques seems to be more of a preference issue for individual physicians rather than established clinical practice. The reliance on proprietary information in commercial image processing techniques makes it very difficult for clinicians to assess the merits of one method over the other, especially as these algorithms are implemented on different scanners, which would confound comparative results even further.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In regions identified by the analysis phase as being homogeneous (no structure or texture), smoothing is applied equally in all directions. This was the first image-processing technique to see widespread commercial use using advances in general purpose computers, as this processing is much more highly compute intensive than frequency and spatial compounding [10,11].…”
Section: Speckle and Speckle Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%