Detection of SLNs with lymphatic US compared favorably with that at lymphoscintigraphy. Lymphatic US can depict metastases within the SLN, which was not possible with lymphoscintigraphy.

Lymphosonography can be used to detect lymphatic drainage pathways and SLNs in a variety of animal models.

Intravenously injected ultrasonic contrast agents making use of encapsulated gas microbubbles have excellent clinical potential for both color and spectral Doppler studies. However, a number of artifacts are associated with sonographic contrast agent measurements. Three artifacts were identified: (1) color "blooming," (2) increased maximum Doppler shift, and (3) spectral "bubble noise." Experiments have been conducted with Albunex and Levovist. These agents were injected into rabbits and humans to allow the cause of the artifacts to be established. Color blooming occurs soon after the bolus injection and is seen as gray scale pixels changing to color display. This is caused by the increase in flow signal strength. The apparent increase in the maximum Doppler shift frequency is due to the limited dynamic range of the spectral display. Only signals above a certain threshold are visible. As the Doppler signal power is enhanced, the highest frequency visible also increases. Finally, very large excursions can sometimes be seen in the spectral display (bubble noise). These might be due to either the breakdown of microbubbles or individual very large bubbles. The color blooming and bubble noise artifacts are easily identifiable and will not influence diagnostic management. The increase in peak Doppler shifts is more troublesome as it prevents comparison of spectral parameters obtained before and after injection of contrast agent.

etection and characterization of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) are important for the management of patients who have a variety of malignancies, including melanoma, breast, colon, and other cancers. [1][2][3][4] Various techniques and imaging agents have been developed to map lymphatic drainage from tumors, including the use of blue dye with surgical dissection and injection of radiopharmaceuticals followed by evaluation with a gamma camBarry B. Goldberg, MD, Daniel A. Merton, BS, RDMS, Ji-Bin Liu, MD, Flemming Forsberg, PhD, Kaijun Zhang, PhD, Madhukar Thakur, PhD, Stephanie Schulz, PhD, Robin Schanche, BS, George F. Murphy, MD, Scott A. Waldman, MD, PhD Received October 6, 2010, ORIGINAL RESEARCHObjectives-The purpose of this study was to compare lymphosonography (ie, contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging [US] after interstitial injection of a US contrast agent) for the detection of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in swine with naturally occurring melanoma tumors to lymphoscintigraphy using blue dye-guided surgical dissection as the reference standard. Also, we sought to determine if lymphosonography can be used to characterize SLNs.Methods-Sixty-three swine with 104 melanomas were evaluated. Contrast-specific US was performed after peritumoral injection (1 mL dose) of Sonazoid (GE Healthcare, Oslo, Norway). Lymphoscintigraphy was performed after peritumoral injections of technetium Tc 99m sulfur colloid. Peritumoral injection of 1% Lymphazurin (Ben Venue Labs, Inc, Bedford, OH) was used to guide SLN resection. The accuracy of SLN detection with the two imaging modalities was compared using the McNemar test. The SLNs were qualitatively and quantitatively characterized as benign or malignant based on the lymphosonography results with histopathology and RNA analyses used as the reference standards.Results-Blue dye-guided surgery identified 351 SLNs. Lymphosonography detected 293 SLNs and 11 false-positives, while lymphoscintigraphy detected 231 SLNs and 20 false-positives. The accuracy of SLN detection was 81.8% for lymphosonography, which was significantly higher than the 63.2% achieved with lymphoscintigraphy (P < .0001). The accuracy of lymphosonography for SLN characterization was 80%. When the size of the enhanced SLN was taken into consideration to characterize SLNs, the accuracy was 86%.Conclusions-Lymphosonography is statistically better than lymphoscintigraphy for the detection of SLNs in this animal model. The ability to use lymphosonography as a means to characterize SLNs as benign or malignant is limited.

SHI appears to improve the diagnosis of breast cancer relative to conventional US and mammography, albeit on the basis of results in a very limited number of subjects.