Abstract:Context:The modified Thomas test is commonly used in the clinical setting to assess flexibility about the thigh region.Objective: To evaluate the clinical reliability of the modified Thomas test for evaluating the flexibility of the rectus femoris muscle about the knee joint.Design: Descriptive laboratory study using a test-retest design. Setting: Institution-based clinical orthopaedic setting.Patients or Other Participants: Fifty-seven individuals between the ages of 18 and 45 years with no history of trauma … Show more
“…14) and for the MTT (intra-rater ICC = 0.67, inter-rater ICC = 0.50) 6) . Our method to measure the distance between the examination table and popliteal fossa might show better reliability compared to these previous studies using a goniometer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1b). Consequently, it is possible that the MTT result in less LL and greater PT compared to the TT 6) . This test was used to evaluate the range of motion about a hip joint.…”
The purpose of this study was to compare the lumbar lordotic angle (LL) and pelvic tilt angle (PT) in the simple modified Thomas test (SMTT) position with LL and PT in the Thomas test (TT) position. Participants (n = 20) were between the ages of 23 and 39 and had no history of trauma. LL and PT were measured by X-ray radiographs under three conditions: the SMTT position, TT position, and supine position. At the same time, the distance between the examination table and the popliteal fossa was measured with a ruler. These measurements were compared by one-way analysis of variance. LL (14.6 ± 6.7 degrees [°]) in the SMTT position was significantly lower than in the TT position (18.6 ± 6.6 °) (p < 0.01). PT (33.5 ± 7.6 °) in the SMTT position was significantly higher than in the TT position (31.3 ± 6.9 °) (p < 0.05). The distance between the examination table and the popliteal fossa in the SMTT position (100 ± 37.7 mm) was significantly higher than in the TT position (73.5 ± 27.4 mm) (p < 0.01). These results suggest that LL and PT in the SMTT position are easier to assess than those in the TT position.
“…14) and for the MTT (intra-rater ICC = 0.67, inter-rater ICC = 0.50) 6) . Our method to measure the distance between the examination table and popliteal fossa might show better reliability compared to these previous studies using a goniometer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1b). Consequently, it is possible that the MTT result in less LL and greater PT compared to the TT 6) . This test was used to evaluate the range of motion about a hip joint.…”
The purpose of this study was to compare the lumbar lordotic angle (LL) and pelvic tilt angle (PT) in the simple modified Thomas test (SMTT) position with LL and PT in the Thomas test (TT) position. Participants (n = 20) were between the ages of 23 and 39 and had no history of trauma. LL and PT were measured by X-ray radiographs under three conditions: the SMTT position, TT position, and supine position. At the same time, the distance between the examination table and the popliteal fossa was measured with a ruler. These measurements were compared by one-way analysis of variance. LL (14.6 ± 6.7 degrees [°]) in the SMTT position was significantly lower than in the TT position (18.6 ± 6.6 °) (p < 0.01). PT (33.5 ± 7.6 °) in the SMTT position was significantly higher than in the TT position (31.3 ± 6.9 °) (p < 0.05). The distance between the examination table and the popliteal fossa in the SMTT position (100 ± 37.7 mm) was significantly higher than in the TT position (73.5 ± 27.4 mm) (p < 0.01). These results suggest that LL and PT in the SMTT position are easier to assess than those in the TT position.
“…Do oce ny dłu go ści zgi na czy sta wu bio dro we go, a tym sa mym do oce ny wy pro stu w sta wie bio dro wym, wy ko rzy sty wa ne są rów nież na stę pu ją ce te sty: Tho ma sa [17], zmo dy fi kowa ny test Tho ma sa [17] oraz test Jan dy [18]. Część ba da czy uwa ża test Tho ma sa i je go mo dy fi ka cję za wia ry god ne na rzę dzie do oce ny dłu go ści zgi na czy bio dra [9,19], cze mu za prze cza ją wy ni ki in nych ba daczy [20,21]. Nor my dłu go ści mię śni są ró żne w za le ż -no ści od me to do lo gii ba da nia (ro dza ju mie rzo ne go ką ta oraz spo so bu je go wy zna cza nia) [9,[19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Wstępunclassified
“…Część ba da czy uwa ża test Tho ma sa i je go mo dy fi ka cję za wia ry god ne na rzę dzie do oce ny dłu go ści zgi na czy bio dra [9,19], cze mu za prze cza ją wy ni ki in nych ba daczy [20,21]. Nor my dłu go ści mię śni są ró żne w za le ż -no ści od me to do lo gii ba da nia (ro dza ju mie rzo ne go ką ta oraz spo so bu je go wy zna cza nia) [9,[19][20][21][22]. Brak do nie sień na uko wych po rów nu ją cych za kres wy prostu w sta wie bio dro wym, oce nio ny w po zy cji le żą cej z ak tyw nym usta wie niem sta wu w od nie sie niu do li nii cię żko ści w po zy cji sto ją cej.…”
Section: Wstępunclassified
“…To evaluate the length of the hip flexors, and therefore to evaluate the extension in the hip joint, following tests are also used: Thomas's test [17], Thomas's modified test [17] and Janda's test [18]. Some researchers consider the Thomas's modified test as a reliable tool for assess ing the length of the hip flexors [9,19], which is contradict ed by the results of other researchers [20,21]. Nor mative values of muscle's length are different and depend on the methodology of the study (the kind of the angle measured and the method of its desigantion) [9,[19][20][21][22].…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.