2021
DOI: 10.3390/electronics10222820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability Aware Multiple Path Installation in Software-Defined Networking

Abstract: Link failures frequently occur in communication networks, which negatively impacts network services delivery. Compared to traditional distributed networks, Software-Defined Networking (SDN) provides numerous benefits for link robustness to avoid services unavailability. To cope with link failures, the existing SDN approaches compute multiple paths and install corresponding flow rules at network switches without considering the reliability value of the primary computed path. This increases computation time, tra… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It severely impacts overall QoS/QoE performance of SDN networks [18] [19]. Well-known approaches like OpenFlow [7] manages communication in between the controllers and switches [20]; however, so far it could not address any malicious assessment and proactive decision making. Merely, applying single network parameter such as packet delivery [20], congestion etc.…”
Section: Fig 1 An Illustration Of Sdn Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It severely impacts overall QoS/QoE performance of SDN networks [18] [19]. Well-known approaches like OpenFlow [7] manages communication in between the controllers and switches [20]; however, so far it could not address any malicious assessment and proactive decision making. Merely, applying single network parameter such as packet delivery [20], congestion etc.…”
Section: Fig 1 An Illustration Of Sdn Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Well-known approaches like OpenFlow [7] manages communication in between the controllers and switches [20]; however, so far it could not address any malicious assessment and proactive decision making. Merely, applying single network parameter such as packet delivery [20], congestion etc. as standalone parameter can't guarantee robustness over real-time dynamic SDNs [21].…”
Section: Fig 1 An Illustration Of Sdn Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, such a design may not guarantee the reliability of the link as the network evolves, some switches could easily be overloaded leading to high congestion. RAF [82] calculates link reliability and installs minimum flow rules for multiple paths based on the reliability value of the path. Such value is appended to N paths, and the path with a higher value is chosen.…”
Section: A Routing With Flows Operations Awarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An augmented Fast Reroute (FRR) approach and a shortcut mechanism is introduced by authors in [21] to store the connectivity rapidly and to resolve unnecessary loops and detours. The authors in [22] have used an approach namely Reliability Aware Multiple Path Flow Rule calculating links reliability and installs minimum flow rules for multiple paths based on the reliability value of the primary path.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%