2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.microrel.2008.06.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability aspects of a radiation detector fabricated by post-processing a standard CMOS chip

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the layer thicknesses were all found to be as expected (in accordance with known spin-curves) the starting material must be comparable in all cases. e variation in nal solvent concentration might be due to environmental conditions, similar to the results on SU-8 adhesion presented in [79]. e variation .…”
Section: Gc-ms Measurementssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because the layer thicknesses were all found to be as expected (in accordance with known spin-curves) the starting material must be comparable in all cases. e variation in nal solvent concentration might be due to environmental conditions, similar to the results on SU-8 adhesion presented in [79]. e variation .…”
Section: Gc-ms Measurementssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…I may seep into the layers and deteriorate the layer quality and performance. After development a nal Hard-Bake (HB) step may be given to strengthen the layer, remove small cracks and improve adhesion [78,79]. is is normally done on a hotplate at temperatures between 120 and 180 • C [71].…”
Section: Standard Su-8 Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, KMPR (MicroChem Corp) has emerged as a new photopolymer alternative with photolithography characteristics similar to those of SU-8 [12]. But unlike SU-8, KMPR is less susceptible to cracking during lithography [13] and has excellent adhesion to metals [13][14][15]. If KMPR and SU-8 are deposited on Al/Cu, and then left in a moist environment, SU-8 loses adhesion quickly, while KMPR maintains a strong adhesion, even for several days [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KMPR has also been shown to have an increased moisture resistance compared to SU-8 [5], demonstrating stable adhesion to substrates when exposed to humid conditions for several days. From a processing point of view, KMPR may be spun up to 100 μm thick in a single spin, displays better adhesion to substrates than SU-8 [6,7], requires less stringent baking conditions to avoid cracking than SU-8 [3] and has high chemical, plasma and dry etch resistance [8]. As a structural material KMPR has been shown to facilitate bonding between layers while maintaining good sidewall profiles [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KMPR has seen use in a number of areas such as microfluidic structures [9], RIE masking layers [8,10], electrodeposition molds [11][12][13][14], proton beam writing [15], absorbance filters for microfluidics (when mixed with appropriate dyes) [16] and structural materials in radiation imaging detection [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%