2008
DOI: 10.1080/03009740801914868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and validity of the Fatigue Severity Scale in Swedish for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Abstract: The FSS-Swe supports construct validity, is feasible, has no important ceiling or floor effects, has satisfactory internal consistency, substantial test-retest reliability, and satisfactory content validity in the SLE patients studied. However, its sensitivity to change needs to be tested.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
69
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
7
69
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There were no missing data for the FSS scale on both test and retest time points, confirming previous findings about high degrees of acceptability and feasibility of the scale in other clinical groups [12,13]. The FSS showed high test-retest reliability when it was re-administered to MDD patients 1 week later.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There were no missing data for the FSS scale on both test and retest time points, confirming previous findings about high degrees of acceptability and feasibility of the scale in other clinical groups [12,13]. The FSS showed high test-retest reliability when it was re-administered to MDD patients 1 week later.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…It was initially validated in multiple sclerosis (MS) and systematic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients [11], while subsequent studies confirmed its psychometric properties in patients with chronic hepatitis C [12], SLE [13] and immune-related polyneuropathies [14]. It has also been used in various other populations: patients with Parkinson's disease [15], chronic fatigue syndrome [16], brain injury [17], sleep disorders [18] and cancer [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 Body structure ⁄ function Foot deformity, defined as tibiocalcaneal angle being greater than 5°varus or valgus, was determined by visual categorization with the participants in standing position. 27 This assessment showed no disagreement with a secondary photograph-based assessment for 66 of the participants.…”
Section: Activity ⁄ Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly used fatigue-specific measurement is the FSS [8,10]. The FSS was found to be reliable and valid measurement in several settings [6,7,11,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. The present study is the first to evaluate the validation of the FSS in patients with FM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Because of these, we chose to use the FSS in FM patients. The FSS has high internal consistency, has good test-retest reliability and also has good concurrent validity in several settings such as multiple sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, spinal cord injury, immune-mediated polyneuropathies, postpoliomyelitis syndrome, Parkinson's disease, chronic hepatitis C, cancer, and stroke [6,7,10,11,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. The present study is the first to evaluate the validation of the FSS in patients with FM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%