Reliability and validity of the Thai version of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (Thai SPADI)

Phongamwong, Chanwit; Choosakde, Apijaree

doi:10.1186/s12955-015-0333-2

Cited by 16 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 16 publications

(22 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The value of ICC was ranged from 0.887 to 0.915 indicating excellent reproducibility of C-SPADI, which was similar to values of German, Slovene, Brazilian, Persian, Thai, and Arabic versions (ICC = 0.84–0.95). [ 10 , 11 , 17 , 18 , 20 ] The values of MDC and SEM were similar as previous studies. [ 10 , 17 ] However, compared with the original version, the ICCs of the subscales and overall scale in C-SPADI were higher than that in the original version.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

“…[ 36 ] SPADI is a widely used scale to evaluate the functioning status of patients with shoulder disorders, and it has been translated into multiple languages and its reliability, validity, and responsiveness have been well established. [ 10 – 20 ] It is meaningful to translate SPADI into Chinese to serve the largest number of population in the world.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[ 4 ] It has been well adapted in 12 languages and widely proved to be a valid and reliable instrument. [ 4 , 10 – 20 ] However, instruments for shoulder are still in shortage in China. Now there is no one Chinese version of SPADI even though China has the largest population of patients with shoulder disorders.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the shoulder pain and disability index in patients with symptomatic shoulder pain

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study is to cross-culturally adapt and translate the original version of SPADI into Chinese (C-SPADI), and to test the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the C-SPADI.This research was a test of previously developed diagnostic criteria in a series of consecutive patients with universally applied gold standard. The original version was translated into Chinese according to international recognized standards. Patients who were diagnosed with a shoulder disorder and underwent shoulder arthroscopic treatments from 2014 to 2015 were enrolled in our study. Each participant was asked to finish the C-SPADI, the Short-Form 36 (SF-36), and the Oxford Shoulder score (OSS) at first visit. The C-SPADI was completed a second time with an interval of 7 days. Six months after arthroscopic treatments, the C-SPADI was completed a third time for responsiveness evaluation. The Cronbach alpha, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), minimally detectable change (MDC), Pearson correlation coefficient (r), effect size (ES), and standardized response mean (SRM) were calculated to evaluate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of C-SPADI respectively.The original version of the SPADI was well adapted and translated into Chinese. The Cronbach alpha ranged from 0.812 to 0.912 in all subscales and total scale of the C-SPADI, indicating good or excellent internal consistency. The test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.887–0.915, SEM = 5.47, MDC = 15.16) was proved to be good or excellent. Moderate or good correlations (r = 0.556–0.672) were obtained between the C-SPADI and the OSS, physical subscales of SF-36; and poor, fair, or moderate correlations (r = 0.038–0.492) were obtained between the C-SPADI and mental subscales of SF-36, which, adequately illustrated good discriminant validity in the C-SPADI. Additionally, the responsiveness was considered good in the C-SPADI (SRM = 1.58–2.44, ES = 1.79–2.17).The C-SPADI was documented to be a reliable, valid, and responsible instrument for self-assessment of patients with shoulder disorders in China.Level of Evidence: Level II.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the shoulder pain and disability index in patients with symptomatic shoulder pain

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The SPADI is translated into multiple languages. Cross‐cultural validation has been performed for the following languages: Spanish (11), Chinese (12), Arabic (13), Danish (14), Norwegian (15), Dutch (16), Indian (Tamil) (17), Hindi (18), Greek (19), Turkish (20), Brazilian Portuguese (21), Persian (22), Thai (23), Nepali (24), Italian (25), and German (26).…”

Section: Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (Spadi)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Measures of Adult Shoulder Function

Buchbinder

Smolen

Huang

et al. 2020

Arthritis Care & Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…15 When compared to other shoulder PROs, the SPADI has demonstrated adequate psychometric properties in the English language, [9][10][11] leading the SPADI to be used widely and translated into different languages. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] However, there is a paucity of published systematic reviews on the translation and cross-cultural adaptation procedures and measurement properties of the SPADI. Systematic reviews summarize and synthesize the highest level of evidence.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic review of the cross-cultural adaptations and measurement properties of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: The shoulder is the leading site of musculoskeletal pain. Patient-reported outcomes, such as the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), allow us to assess shoulder pain in a clinical setting. Since the SPADI was developed in English, many cultures have cross-culturally adapted the SPADI for clinical use. The purpose of this review was to assess the translation and cross-cultural adaptation procedures and measurement properties of the adapted SPADI. Methods: A systematic review was performed on cultural adaptations of the SPADI accessible through MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE and/or Google Scholar. Included were prospective cohort studies that used an adapted version of the SPADI. All studies were evaluated according to the guidelines for cross-cultural adaptations and the guidelines for measurement properties. Results: The search retrieved 19 studies that met the inclusion criteria. According to the recommended guidelines for cross-cultural adaptations, 16 studies performed 100% of the steps and 1 study performed 80% of the steps. When evaluating the studies' psychometric properties based on the quality criteria, none of the studies reported all recommended measurement properties. The measurement property of reliability was reported fully by 74% of studies. Internal consistency was fully reported by 74% of studies. None of the studies were able to fully report responsiveness, agreement and/or construct validity. Conclusions: Whilst the majority of studies followed proper translation procedures, testing of the measurement properties were inadequate. Therefore, it is recommended that the current adapted versions of the SPADI undergo further evaluation before use in clinical practice.

show abstract

Reliability and validity of the Thai version of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (Thai SPADI)

Cited by 16 publications

References 16 publications

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the shoulder pain and disability index in patients with symptomatic shoulder pain

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the shoulder pain and disability index in patients with symptomatic shoulder pain

Measures of Adult Shoulder Function

A systematic review of the cross-cultural adaptations and measurement properties of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About