Reliability and Validity of the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Portuguese Version

Marques, C.; Matos, Ana Paula; Salvador, Maria do Céu; Arnarson, Eiríkur Örn; Craighead, W. Edward

doi:10.1007/s10578-021-01196-5

Cited by 8 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For inter‐rater liability, generally consistent findings with our studies were observed in previous studies of the K‐SADS‐PL for DSM‐5, with κ ranging from 0.57 to 1.00 (Marques et al., 2021; Ünal et al., 2019). Other than newly added modules for ASD, DMDD, selective mutism and binge eating disorder, the modules basically preserved the former version of the K‐SADS‐PL.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

“…Finally, as in the present study, good construct validity was found in previous studies of the K-SADS-PL for DSM-5 (Marques et al, 2021;Ünal et al, 2019) and for DSM-IV (Ambrosini, 2000;Birmaher et al, 2009;Brasil & Bordin, 2010;Kaufman et al, 1997;Kim et al, 2004;Lauth et al, 2010;Villabø et al, 2016).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

“…The updated version of the K‐SADS‐PL for DSM‐5 has received empirical validation in four studies (Marques et al., 2021; Nishiyama et al., 2020; Ünal et al., 2019; Þórðarson et al., 2020). Studies of the Turkish and Portuguese adapted K‐SADS‐PL revealed good reliability with a kappa coefficient ( κ ) ≥ 0.6 and generally good construct validity but did not examine the criterion validity (Marques et al., 2021; Ünal et al., 2019). A study of the Icelandic adapted K‐SADS‐PL also revealed fair to good reliability, with κ ≥ 0.57, but the validity was not examined (Þórðarson et al., 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Psychometrics of the kiddie schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia present and lifetime version for DSM‐5 in Japanese outpatients

Makino

Suzuki

Nishiyama

et al. 2023

Int J Methods Psych Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveThe Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School‐Age Children‐Present and Lifetime version (K‐SADS‐PL) is a widely used semi‐structured diagnostic interview in child and adolescent psychiatry. However, the psychometric properties of its updated version, the K‐SADS‐PL for DSM‐5, have scarcely been examined, especially for criterion validity. This study was designed to examine the inter‐rater reliability, criterion validity and construct validity of the K‐SADS‐PL for DSM‐5 in 137 Japanese outpatients.MethodsTwo of 12 experienced clinicians independently performed the K‐SADS interview for each patient in a conjoint session, and the resulting consensus diagnosis was compared with a “best‐estimate” diagnosis made by two of eight experienced clinicians using all available information for the patient.ResultsThe inter‐rater reliability was excellent, as shown by κ > 0.75 for all disorders, with the exception of current separation anxiety disorder. The criterion validity was fair to good, as shown by κ > 0.40 for all disorders, with the exception of current and lifetime agoraphobia. The construct validity was also good, as shown by theoretically expected associations between the K‐SADS‐PL diagnoses and subscales of the child behavior checklist.ConclusionThe K‐SADS‐PL for DSM‐5, now available in Japanese, generates valid diagnoses in child and adolescent psychiatry.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Psychometrics of the kiddie schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia present and lifetime version for DSM‐5 in Japanese outpatients

Makino

Suzuki

Nishiyama

et al. 2023

Int J Methods Psych Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The Kiddie-SADS-L can assess the current and history of mental disorders in children and adolescents, including behavioral disorders such as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, opposition defiance disorder, and conduct disorder, as well as common psychopathological phenomena such as affective disorder, anxiety disorder, and psychotic disorder ( 39 ). It has content validity, the interrater consistency was 93–100%, and the test-retest reliability coefficient for common mental disorders ranged from 0.63 to 1.00 ( 40 ).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Protocol of a randomized controlled trial to investigate the efficacy and neural correlates of mindfulness-based habit reversal training in children with Tourette syndrome

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundTourette syndrome (TS) is a developmental neuropsychiatric disorder. Behavior therapy, especially habit reversal training (HRT), has gradually become regarded as one of the core therapies for TS. Mindfulness approaches can improve psychological adjustment and reduce stress and anxiety, suggesting potential benefits when incorporated into behavior therapy. To improve the efficacy of HRT, we combined it with mindfulness, an approach named mindfulness-based habitual reversal training (MHRT). The aim of this protocol is to investigate the efficacy and neural mechanisms of MHRT for TS.Methods/designWe will perform a randomized control trial (RCT) to evaluate the efficacy and neural mechanisms of MHRT. The sample will include 160 participants (including 120 patients with TS and 40 healthy controls). The patient sample will be randomly divided into three groups exposed to three different types of training: MHRT, HRT, and psychoeducation and supportive therapy (PST). Participants will be assessed and undergo resting-state fMRI scans at baseline and at the end of the 12-week training. The Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) and Premonitory Urge for Tic Scale (PUTS) will be used to assess the severity of tic symptoms and premonitory urges. The primary outcomes are change scores on the YGTSS and other assessments from baseline and the end of the training. The secondary outcomes are the neural correlates of these trainings among these groups based on graph theory, which is used to characterize brain functional connectivity networks. The default mode network (DMN) and the salience network (SN) will be assessed (which have been associated with mindfulness as well as the generation of tic symptoms) by network parameters, including clustering coefficients and shortest path lengths. Changes in these network parameters will be regarded as the neural correlates of the behavioral training.DiscussionMHRT was newly developed for the treatment of TS. MHRT may lead to greater reductions in tic severity than traditional HRT. Changes in the network parameters of the DMN and SN may show associations with the efficacy of MHRT.Clinical trial registrationhttp://www.chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR2100053077, China.

show abstract

“…All the children were evaluated by a psychiatrist under the supervision of one of the authors (E.F.F.) to identify any mental disorder using the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children − Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL) [ 27 , 28 , 29 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Auditory Outcomes in Adolescents with Prenatal Alcohol Exposure

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Investigate three aspects of auditory function (auditory acuity, cochlear dysfunction, and auditory processing) in adolescents with fetal alcohol exposure without phenotypic changes. Fifty-one adolescents with and without intrauterine exposure to alcohol were selected from a cohort study. The summons, evaluation, and analysis of the results were carried out blindly regarding the respective exposure to alcohol. The auditory tests were pure-tone audiometry, transient otoacoustic emissions, and behavioral assessment of auditory processing (speech-in-noise, dichotic digits, and gap-in-noise). After testing 45 adolescents were included in the evaluation and were divided into exposed (n=22) and non-exposed (n=23) groups. Hearing loss was identified in one subject in the exposed group (4.5%). In the absence of hearing loss, there were no significant differences in tonal thresholds or in the magnitudes of the sensory (cochlear) responses between groups (p>0.05). There was also no difference between the two groups regarding performance on the processing tests (speech-in-noise [p=0.71], dichotic [p=0.94], and gap-in-noise [p=0.33]. However, the exposed group had more cases of hearing disorders (hearing loss plus auditory processing disorders) than the non-exposed group (22.7% vs. 4.3%).

show abstract

Reliability and Validity of the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Portuguese Version

Cited by 8 publications

References 34 publications

Psychometrics of the kiddie schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia present and lifetime version for DSM‐5 in Japanese outpatients

Psychometrics of the kiddie schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia present and lifetime version for DSM‐5 in Japanese outpatients

Protocol of a randomized controlled trial to investigate the efficacy and neural correlates of mindfulness-based habit reversal training in children with Tourette syndrome

Auditory Outcomes in Adolescents with Prenatal Alcohol Exposure

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About