1995
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.1995.tb01875.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Yale‐Brown Obsessive‐Compulsive Scale

Abstract: The reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (JY-BOCS) were determined by 20 raters for 12 Japanese patients with obsessive compulsive disorder at four institutions. Interrater reliability for the total JY-BOCS score was excellent, and the intraclass correlation coefficient was high (ICC = 0.960). Internal consistency was also excellent (Cronbach's alpha = 0.889). Concurrent and discriminant validity of the JY-BOCS was examined by comparing the scores on the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All patients had a sole diagnosis of OCD and none had been taking any kind of psychotropic medication for at least 8 weeks, of which 5 were drug naïve. All patients were tested with the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) to assess the severity of OCD symptoms [30], the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) to assess the severity of depression [31], and the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) to assess the severity of anxiety [32], Patients who had full remission were excluded (defined as a Y-BOCS score <10) [33]. Exclusion criteria for patients and healthy volunteers were: 1) significant disease such as neurological diseases, pulmonary, cardiac, renal, hepatic, endocrine systems, and metabolic disorders; 2) current or past DSM-IV axis I diagnosis of any psychiatric illness except OCD; and 3) DSM-IV diagnosis of mental retardation and pervasive developmental disorders based on a clinical interview and psychosocial history.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients had a sole diagnosis of OCD and none had been taking any kind of psychotropic medication for at least 8 weeks, of which 5 were drug naïve. All patients were tested with the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) to assess the severity of OCD symptoms [30], the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) to assess the severity of depression [31], and the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) to assess the severity of anxiety [32], Patients who had full remission were excluded (defined as a Y-BOCS score <10) [33]. Exclusion criteria for patients and healthy volunteers were: 1) significant disease such as neurological diseases, pulmonary, cardiac, renal, hepatic, endocrine systems, and metabolic disorders; 2) current or past DSM-IV axis I diagnosis of any psychiatric illness except OCD; and 3) DSM-IV diagnosis of mental retardation and pervasive developmental disorders based on a clinical interview and psychosocial history.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that the OCD symptom structure has substantial transcultural stability across Western and Eastern cultures, suggesting that OCD is mediated by universal psychobiological mechanisms [5]. Although several questionnaires have been developed that evaluate the severity of OCD symptoms in the Japanese population, such as the Japanese versions of the Y-BOCS [6] and Maudsley Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory (MOCI-J) [7], none are suitable for quick, effective clinical assessments. In particular, the Y-BOCS, one of the most commonly used scales in OCD research, uses a semi-structured interview format, consisting of 10 core items that assess time spent on obsessions or compulsions, resistance, interference, distress, and control [4,6].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we did not investigate the relationship between the OCI-J and other self-report measures of OCD, such as the Japanese version of Padua Inventory [48,49], or clinician-administered scales, such as the Y-BOCS [6]. These comparisons would be helpful to fully establish concurrent validity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each item was scored, 0 (none), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), and 3 (severe) [7]. The insight subscale ''Insight into obsessions and compulsions'' of the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) [19,20] was use to assess insight into TKS symptoms. The Sheehan Disability Scale [21] was used to measure the impairment in the patients' life.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%