2004
DOI: 10.1037/1040-3590.16.2.120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and Validity of the Beck Depression Inventory--II With Adolescent Psychiatric Inpatients.

Abstract: This investigation was conducted to validate the Beck Depression Inventory--II (BDI-II; A. T. Beck, R. A. Steer, & G. K. Brown, 1996) in samples of adolescent psychiatric inpatients. The sample in each substudy was primarily Caucasian. In Study 1, expert raters (N=7) and adolescent psychiatric inpatients (N=13) evaluated the BDI-II items to assess content validity. In Study 2, confirmatory factor analyses of several first-order solutions failed to provide adequate fit estimates to data for 205 boys, 203 girls,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
181
2
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 254 publications
(208 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
20
181
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Cronbach's alpha in our sample was 0.864, indicating good internal reliability [18]. The reliability and validity of the BDI-II have been confirmed in clinical and community samples of adolescents [23,24].…”
Section: Mental Healthsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Cronbach's alpha in our sample was 0.864, indicating good internal reliability [18]. The reliability and validity of the BDI-II have been confirmed in clinical and community samples of adolescents [23,24].…”
Section: Mental Healthsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Third, we relied on self-report assessment to measure clinical change. While the BDI-II is a reliable measure in adolescents (Osman et al 2004), inclusion of a clinician-administered measure such as the CDRS-R at the post-treatment assessment would have provided additional and important information about clinical change. Fourth, since the only clinical measure that we collected at the post-treatment scanning session was the BDI-II, we are unable to conclude whether the identified change correlates represent markers of improvement in other forms of psychopathology such as anxiety.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Internal consistency (α = .92) and test re-test reliability (r = .93 over 1 week) are established (Beck et al, 1996), and evidence for construct validity has been demonstrated (e.g. Dozois, Dobson, & Ahnberg, 1998;Osman, Kopper, Barrios, Gutierrez, & Bagge, 2004). Steer, Ball, Ranieri, and Beck (1997) also provide evidence of convergent validity, while Osman, Downs, Barrios, Kopper, Guitierrez, and Chiros (1997) found support for the discriminant validity of the BDI-II.…”
Section: Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (Epq) the 23-item Neurotimentioning
confidence: 99%