2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.12.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and validity assessment of a glenoid bone loss measurement using the Bernageau profile view in chronic anterior shoulder instability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The diameter of the glenoid is measured and compared with the healthy side to estimate bone loss. A study by Pansard et al [26] however showed poor correlation with arthroscopic findings in affected individuals in a small retrospective cohort of patients with glenoid bone loss.…”
Section: Plain Radiographsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The diameter of the glenoid is measured and compared with the healthy side to estimate bone loss. A study by Pansard et al [26] however showed poor correlation with arthroscopic findings in affected individuals in a small retrospective cohort of patients with glenoid bone loss.…”
Section: Plain Radiographsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Sixty patients with X index C 0.4 were included. The mean age was 28 years (average [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. There were 56 men and 4 women, with 40 right and 20 left shoulders.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors described different radiological methods of detecting and measuring these bony defects [2,5,20,26,27]. The loss of the anterior sclerotic glenoid line (SGL) in neutral rotation radiographs is currently widely used to detect anterior glenoid bone loss [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, their method is not able to detect inferior glenoid fractures. 15 Griffith et al 16 proposed a technique to measure bone loss by measuring the diameter of the affected shoulder and comparing the result with the contralateral healthy shoulder. Lastly, Burkhart et al 17 described an arthroscopic method for quantifying glenoid bone loss using the glenoid bare spot as a landmark and applying similar principles of the diameter-based method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%