2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and Validity Analysis of the Transfer Assessment Instrument

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The items on the TAI were based on clinical practice guidelines [11], current knowledge in the literature [18], and best clinical practices related to transfers. The TAI has acceptable to high inter- and intrarater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values ranging from 0.72 to 0.88) and good face, content, and construct validity [2931]. However, no study has associated a clinical assessment of transfer skills to biomechanical changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The items on the TAI were based on clinical practice guidelines [11], current knowledge in the literature [18], and best clinical practices related to transfers. The TAI has acceptable to high inter- and intrarater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values ranging from 0.72 to 0.88) and good face, content, and construct validity [2931]. However, no study has associated a clinical assessment of transfer skills to biomechanical changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TAI takes less than 10 min to complete and requires no specialized equipment or testing tools [21]. The scale has been rigorously tested for validity and reliability [21,27,29].…”
Section: Testing Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A formal investigation into the transfer skill deficit rates of nonparticipating Veterans and civilian patients is needed to extend our understanding of the effects of healthcare environments on transfer skill acquisition. Additionally, the TAI is a relatively new outcome measure, although most of the items have acceptable to high levels of reliability [27] and the validity of TAI has been extensively tested [21,29].…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A final score is given ranging from 0 = very poor transfer quality to 10 = excellent transfer quality. The TAI has been found to be valid and reliable in fulltime wheelchair users, including individuals with MS. 15 Seated postural control was evaluated using a Bertec force plate (model FP4060-05; Bertec Inc, Columbus, OH). Per the protocol established by Shin and Sosnoff, 16 seated postural control was assessed by having participants sit with their arms resting in their lap with both their feet and back unsupported for 30 seconds.…”
Section: Outcome Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%